• absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    “People didn’t dig our chatbots. Ut must ve because we’ve fallen behind”

    The level of delusion, I swear

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Microsoft didn’t miss the “Mobile” wave. Their leadership made a conscious decision to throw in the towel.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not only that, they had solid hardware, a good OS, and then for some reason thougt it would be a great idea to charge people for publishing apps. Consequently, there were none. Funnily enough, Nokia did the same and also failed because of it. I think exactly this is also part of the reason why Blackberry failed.

      Corpos not seeing how people mostly use free software on iOS/Android (or in fucking general) is mind-boggling

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Windows phones were a good product with a UI problem. They could have changed up the UI and been fine. Instead they let Apple and Google and Huawei, LG, Motorola, and every other phone company eat their lunch. They gave up with a token resistance.

    • 0ops@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I never owned one, but I thought the main issue was the barren app ecosystem? Everyone I talked to that had one really liked the ui

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        It may depend on the iteration you had. I remember very clearly that the touch interface was pretty good for a resistive touch screen, but I found icons and the interface to be made for ants and that was back when I had better than 20/20 vision. I also do remember that apps were pretty sparse.

        I think the interface was better than Palms interface and Blackberry’s but the iPhone in particular had a better easier to navigate UI, and android (even though they took a little bit to catch up), also generally had a better interface.

        I feel like if you were a windows user it was fine. Other than that it just wasn’t that great. But they didn’t even try to compete once they got actual competition.

        Edit: My experience with Windows phone was from the Windows phone 5 interface (back when it was similar to the desktop client before they did their tile touch iteration to make it more like windows 8).

        So in fairness, it did get a little better but that was pretty much right before MS gave up on it entirely.

  • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Internet Explorer, too late for the internet, because everyone now uses the first browser that was ever released. Windows mobile, too late for mobile phones, because Nokia were the early monopoly that will never end.

    It’s always the earliest product that becomes ubiquitous by default right?