University of Washington researchers planned to have preschool teachers wear cameras that would record everything they saw from a first-person perspective, including the children they were teaching, then use that footage to develop AI models. Crucially, the program was presented as opt-out, rather than opt-in, meaning that parents had to take steps to prevent recordings of their children being processed by AI.

“With your permission, your child’s lead teacher may wear a small teacher-worn camera that captures the teacher’s approximate first-person perspective, and/or we may place a fixed video camera in the classroom,” a document given to parents and later shared with 404 Media reads. “These videos simply capture the normal interactions between teachers and children during regular classroom activities. Recordings occur during morning program hours up to 150 minutes, up to 4 visits in one month. Your child will not be asked to do anything new or different. Their daily routine will stay exactly the same.”

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It should be noted that UW has an on-campus experimental preschool where they do early childhood research. This would never have been done in a regular preschool elsewhere.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s very true, especially something controversial like AI and the likeness of children. All sources seem to be biased, though, so I don’t know that we have ever seen the real story.

        • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Parents are allowed to be against their children being used to train AI lol. “All sources seem to be biased” Fuck yeah I would be biased about this if it were my kid.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Bias |= journalism, which is my point. It’s passed off as journalism but it’s really more like a blog post. I’d like to see the Seattle Times take up the story.

            • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              You’ve never heard of 404?

              Usually smaller stories are reported like this before the seattle times ends up picking it up.

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’ve seen it posted here or there but never paid much attention. This was the first article I really noticed.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    How about you go do the research on your own kids… don’t like it? Then no one else would either.

    I’m betting ChatGPT came up with this fucking ridiculous idea.