• idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      But don’t freak out, vitamin c is still good for you

      “Thus, the results observed here for these food additives are not true for natural substances found in fruits and vegetables,” she added.

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        but, how? it’s the same stuff, why’s the result different when they come from fruits?

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          And fructose is naturally present in many fruits but high fructose corn syrup is bad.

          The largest difference is 1) the dosage and 2) the lack of other parts of the combination such as the lack of fiber in fruit juices.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe Impurities when manufactured at scale, or that we end up consuming more of than if we got it naturally? Or maybe something in fruits helps counteract it?

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      However, prior research by Touvier and her team found ultraprocessed foods make up only 35% of foods with preservatives people consumed. That means “preservatives are ubiquitous,” said lead author Anaïs Hasenböhler.

    • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The preservatives. Because they’re manufactured. Ultra processed foods, in and of themselves cause a huge ratio of health issues, and although they seemed to relate the problems mostly to the preservatives, the ultra processed foods themselves, were what was recommended to avoid.

  • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s actually a bit complicated and complex, entirely worth reading the whole article. Here’s a couple of exerpts While antioxidants such as citric and ascorbic acid are found naturally in foods such as fruits, they are “not exactly natural” when used as preservatives, senior author Mathilde Touvier

    “Naturally occurring ascorbic acid and added ascorbic acid — which may be chemically manufactured — may have different impacts on health,” said Touvier, who is also director of research at France’s National Institute of Health and Medical Research in Paris.

    “Thus, the results observed here for these food additives are not true for natural substances found in fruits and vegetables,” she added.

    “There is no food group/item to remove from the diet in order to fix things,” Hasenböhler said in an email. “These results also support the recommendations for consumers to favour non-to-minimally-processed foods.”

    Ultraprocessed foods have been linked to an approximately 50% higher risk of cardiovascular disease-related death, and they may boost the risk of obesity by 55%, sleep disorders by 41% and the development of type 2 diabetes by 40%. Obesity, diabetes and poor sleep are closely connected to poor heart health.

    The studies appear linked, too

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      That makes it sound like the problem isn’t the additive, but the processed food itself (or a related factor like an associated lifestyle).

      • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s definitely the food. And it’s both. The two studied preservatives, when in manufactured form, and ultra processed foods, are both known to be harmful. Their take away suggestion is to limit ultra processed foods, because they all can contain these preservatives. They say that because overall that will have the most benefit, mostly because they can only account 35% of the known preservatives in our foods, yet. So theres still 75% we are consuming, in our foods, that they aren’t yet able to find. Just of these two mentioned preservatives. It’s a long term exposure, kinda thing, it’s not going to kill you if you eat it once, and eating it here and there isn’t as long term damaging, as if it made up the bulk of your diet. If it’s predominantly most of what you eat, the accumulating harm, builds up.

        The way it causes obesity and diabetes, I wonder if it’s effecting the insulin reception system, on a cellular level. That essentially the body reads it as sugar and it overloads the system.

    • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Doesn’t this mean they are looking for the wrong thing. The vitamin C is present in these ultra processed foods but it’s something else in them that causes the problem.

      • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I get what you’re thinking, Vitamin c, in an of itself isn’t bad, but artificially manufactured Vitamin c isn’t the same, it’s not from a naturally derived product, and it’s been studied that the fake stuff, used as a preservative, is harmful, the naturally occurring stuff, isn’t harmful. They suggest just reducing your processed foods intake, as much as possible to reduce exposure.

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      While the findings of the new research are observational and cannot prove cause and effect, the study did a good job of controlling for other factors that may influence health, such as age, body mass index or BMI, smoking, physical activity and diet in general, said Rachel Richardson, a methods support unit manager for The Cochrane Collaboration, an international nonprofit highly respected for its scientific approach to research. She was not involved in the study.

      From the article,.emphasis my own. Not saying you’re wrong, and I’m skeptical myself. But I’m also not a subject matter expert or a manager for a well regarded international nonprofit

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Last I checked death still comes one to a customer, and comes in millions of forms. So what’s the point in worrying about the how?

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Because you don’t just have a set date where you die and it’s just a matter of how.

      High blood pressure shortens your life and reduces your number of healthy and mobile years.

      If we know what is participating in that decline, we can push it back. Anything else is just letting corpos decide what’s profitable, not what’s best.