- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Is it still needed? I thought there was multiple free and open source software replacements available.
Corporate wants to pay because “huh missing spend? this guy must be stealing then”
Kudos to the developers, hats off, but why does anyone use WinRAR today? WinRAR was a lifesaver when large files needed to be compressed and split into 1.2 or 1.44 MB pieces so they could be transported on several floppy disks.
I never did that in that era for some reason, maybe bc CD burning got there fast enough for me? The only program I used to compress and split files was pkzip
In the days of Napster, when it took like 30 minutes to download a ~4mb mp3, and before thumb drives and cd burning was a thing, it was a life saver when you got a new computer. Took hours to transfer over all your songs, but at least you didn’t have to redownload and pray no one picked up the phone again.
This feels like when that fish was discovered that was thought to have been extinct for millions of years.
Coelacanth
I don’t understand how some people can be using that garbage when 7zip exists
While both are Archive Programs, WinRAR does a bunch of things that 7Zip does not and some things 7Zip does better, as 7Zip does a couple of things that WinRAR doesn’t and a few things that WinRAR doesn’t do as well as 7Zip.
Also depending on what you are archiving WinRAR does it better for various things, where 7Zip tends to work better at Raw Data and certain Data Structures.
How is it garbage though?
It’s closed source
But it works.
People often overestimate how much a normal everyday user needs or cares. Goes for pretty much everything, tech, music, art, etc.
I found one explanation in that winrar is developed by germans and 7zip by a russian guy. Maybe some people dont want to support russian stuff? But thats pretty far fetched imo…
In fact both of them are developed by russians
Isnt winrar developed by some people in Berlin?
It was invented and developed by a Russian but the company that sells it is registered in Germany.
I don’t understand how people can be using that garbage when
tarexiststar doesn’t even provide compression. Which may be what you want. If you have a weak CPU and a big storage device why would you waste the cpu cycles? I know I’ve removed the compression step in AUR builds for example. But if you don’t know what it does, maybe an all in one solution like 7zip or winrar might be a more attractive prospect.
The tar format doesn’t, but the
tarcommand has command line flags for a number of compression algorithms, and if your algorithm of choice doesn’t have a flag, you can just pipe it to the compression program.Compressed tars suck anyway since you need to decompress them in order to get the list of files inside, unlike in any other sane archive format.
The pixz compressor provides parallized compression/decompression (desirable on modern CPUs), uses LZMA (like 7zip or
xz), and provides indexed access when used astar'scompressor. The last of these is what you want.$ tar cvf foo.tar.pixz -Ipixz foo/pixzis packaged in Debian-family distros.I very rarely list the content of compressed files, so that doesn’t bother me much.
Back in the day the trick to get better compression on zip files was to first make an uncompressed zip file, and then put that in a compressed zip file.
tardid that all by itself!I mean that’s what GUI archivers do when you open the file.
So tar is only useful for some kind of automatic workflows where archives are processed automatically. Like what package managers do.
Maybe enterprise support? It know this is important for many companies or governmental agencies.
People, not companies
People who never explored the right-click menu, apparently.
I’d like to see you make a RAR file with that Right Click Menu.
I just use file systems that compress behind the scenes. Over the wires I might use a -z option if I am in a hurry.
izarc+cli
