For years, Chinese leader Xi Jinping has pushed ethnic minority groups like Tibetans and Uyghurs to adopt an identity rooted in Chinese nationality and allegiance to the ruling Communist Party.
What they mean by division is other cultures existing.
What they mean by unity is everyone acting like Beijing, or getting re-educated.
If you applied this to Burgerland it would mean Spanish is illegal and Muslims better watch their ass. Which you’d surely have no trouble condemning, since it’s obviously intolerable and the Bad Camp did it.
According to your special mind. In the meantime the law says something else. The other languages in china are not banned, you are just fabricating a reality you feel comfortable in. It’s okay boy, as long as you are happy, I’m happy :)
Ah, looks like you finished your tokens for today. Would you like to buy 100 more tokens for the low low price of 259,99$?
Sorry I don’t take questions from rude users who think they are right until their back is against the wall. You can go read the article, it’s in English.
The article that says they’re banning schools in other languages? Like we’re talking about, and you’re denying? You fraud?
You can weasel around and say it’s only the primary language, but that’s still banning schools… in other languages. It’s turning every identity besides Han + Mandarin into a secondary identity, barely tolerated, with oversight. It makes their existence conditional on ongoing state approval. That’s ethnic cleansing. That’s bloodless erasure of any local identity, where local can mean, the entirety of Tibet.
You don’t get to sneer ‘RTFA!’ when TFA opens with ‘loyalty to the party is mandatory.’
Hey no, no you are getting boring now, don’t do this to me bro.
Let’s do this game, I won’t reply anymore until you find me in the article the words “banning schools”. You said the article said it, please quote.
Maybe you are referring to this bit (?):
Under the new rules, schools and government agencies must use Mandarin Chinese as their primary language; classrooms must ensure that their curriculum “forges a strong sense of the community of the Chinese people,” and all parents must guide children to “love the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese people.”
Unfortunately you refuse to understand the English language.
It’s turning every identity besides Han + Mandarin into a secondary identity, barely tolerated, with oversight. It makes their existence conditional on ongoing state approval. That’s ethnic cleansing.That’s bloodless erasure of any local identity, where local can mean, the entirety of Tibet.
This vomit is pure fabrication.
Bear in mind, I’m dog-walking all of you fucks using CNN AS A SOURCE. I didn’t even put my sources because you racists babies immediately start screaming “Aaaaa we only like white people newspaperrr!!! Everything else is propaganda!!”
‘I’ve quoted what I demand you prove, making me the victor!’
What else could it mean, Wimp Lo?
This is why I tried asking your interpretation. You don’t appear to have one. You just posture and spit, as if ‘all schools must use this primary language’ is somehow different from banning schools in another primary language. Can you even form a contrary positive claim? Do you know what having a position looks like, besides performing arrogance?
What they mean by division is other cultures existing.
What they mean by unity is everyone acting like Beijing, or getting re-educated.
If you applied this to Burgerland it would mean Spanish is illegal and Muslims better watch their ass. Which you’d surely have no trouble condemning, since it’s obviously intolerable and the Bad Camp did it.
According to your special mind. In the meantime the law says something else. The other languages in china are not banned, you are just fabricating a reality you feel comfortable in. It’s okay boy, as long as you are happy, I’m happy :)
Walk us through what you think this law actually does.
Ah, looks like you finished your tokens for today. Would you like to buy 100 more tokens for the low low price of 259,99$?
Sorry I don’t take questions from rude users who think they are right until their back is against the wall. You can go read the article, it’s in English.
The article that says they’re banning schools in other languages? Like we’re talking about, and you’re denying? You fraud?
You can weasel around and say it’s only the primary language, but that’s still banning schools… in other languages. It’s turning every identity besides Han + Mandarin into a secondary identity, barely tolerated, with oversight. It makes their existence conditional on ongoing state approval. That’s ethnic cleansing. That’s bloodless erasure of any local identity, where local can mean, the entirety of Tibet.
You don’t get to sneer ‘RTFA!’ when TFA opens with ‘loyalty to the party is mandatory.’
Hey no, no you are getting boring now, don’t do this to me bro.
Let’s do this game, I won’t reply anymore until you find me in the article the words “banning schools”. You said the article said it, please quote.
Maybe you are referring to this bit (?):
Unfortunately you refuse to understand the English language.
This vomit is pure fabrication.
Bear in mind, I’m dog-walking all of you fucks using CNN AS A SOURCE. I didn’t even put my sources because you racists babies immediately start screaming “Aaaaa we only like white people newspaperrr!!! Everything else is propaganda!!”
🥱
‘I’ve quoted what I demand you prove, making me the victor!’
What else could it mean, Wimp Lo?
This is why I tried asking your interpretation. You don’t appear to have one. You just posture and spit, as if ‘all schools must use this primary language’ is somehow different from banning schools in another primary language. Can you even form a contrary positive claim? Do you know what having a position looks like, besides performing arrogance?
No you are right, primary language equals banning schools equals ethnic cleansing. Everything is the same. No nuances, fuck reality. 🥱😴
The gentlest excuses are still erasing that culture. Still quashing the minority with the majority.
You cannot defend that because you don’t know what a defense looks like. You don’t mean things when you say words.