qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 days agoborrow checker?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1274arrow-down18
arrow-up1266arrow-down1imageborrow checker?lemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square106linkfedilink
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoEven if the pay is good - unfucking vibed code is going to be very grueling. Like fixing legacy code but so much worse - because legacy code at least used to make sense at some point in the past.
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours ago legacy code at least used to make sense at some point in the past. That assumption doesn’t hold where I work.
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 hours agoDid you go back with a time machine to make sure it didn’t make sense back when it was written?
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 hours agoI know my colleagues and former colleagues, and have reason to be confident it didn’t.
Even if the pay is good - unfucking vibed code is going to be very grueling. Like fixing legacy code but so much worse - because legacy code at least used to make sense at some point in the past.
That assumption doesn’t hold where I work.
Did you go back with a time machine to make sure it didn’t make sense back when it was written?
I know my colleagues and former colleagues, and have reason to be confident it didn’t.