Lemdro.id
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
cm0002 to Technology@midwest.socialEnglish · 5 days ago

China built a 40-story tower that stores wind power by stacking concrete

boingboing.net

external-link
message-square
7
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.ml
  • technology@hexbear.net
  • technology@lemmygrad.ml
11
external-link

China built a 40-story tower that stores wind power by stacking concrete

boingboing.net

cm0002 to Technology@midwest.socialEnglish · 5 days ago
message-square
7
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.ml
  • technology@hexbear.net
  • technology@lemmygrad.ml
A 148-meter tower in Jiangsu stores 100 MWh by hoisting 35-ton concrete blocks with surplus wind power.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh, perfect, concrete is the greenest of green! What genius! We’re saved! /s 😶🤮

    The cement industry alone accounts for roughly 8% of global carbon dioxide emissions—emitting more than the aviation and global shipping industries combined.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      The site says the blocks are made from recycled concrete

      • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s supposed to be a finite resource, not a poster child for why more is “necessary”. ☝🏼

    • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Surplus wind power hoists 35-ton blocks cast from recycled concrete and industrial aggregate toward the top.

  • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    @cm0002 So that is the equivalent of the average nuclear plant output for six minutes, very useful. I’d instead invest the concrete and steel into making the actual plant, that way I would have 1GW (10x100MW) 24x7 for 60 or 70 years, take up less land, and not require energy from another source to “store”. When one looks at the economics of what it takes to store six minutes of a nuke plant’s worth of electricity the economics of wind and solar, or lack thereof, become obvious. When you consider all the energy that was required to make the concrete to store that six minutes, it becomes especially insane.

  • Bohne93@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh wow, been years since i last heared of gravity batteries. AdamSomething i think made a video about these, tldr water reservoirs are much much more efficent

  • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Somebody just watched a Half as Interesting video

Technology@midwest.social

technology@midwest.social

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@midwest.social

Post articles or questions about technology

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 7 users / day
  • 63 users / week
  • 348 users / month
  • 959 users / 6 months
  • 6 local subscribers
  • 2.55K subscribers
  • 513 Posts
  • 851 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.social
  • UI: 0.19.11
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org