You must log in or register to comment.
This really doesn’t have much to say, other than “it’s complicated” while echoing some often repeated poor-faith arguments in favor of foolish unrestricted AI use.
But it’s nice to have a specific place for positive takes on AI, I guess?
Edit: Also I was really hoping for some awareness of the day when BASIC hit and caused the real actual great programming reset.
But it’s nice to have a specific place for positive takes on AI, I guess?
I think so. Lemmys fee peer pressure to hate anything connected to AI, even though many of its users are programmers who use AI tools themselves.
I’ve vibe-coded apps for my own personal use in under an hour. I never woulda hired anyone to build them and I never wold have paid for commercial versions. AI allowed me to create tools that fit my exact needs.
Anyone who wants to spend years learning traditional programming can still do that. AI’s not stopping them. But some of us just want to turn an idea into something useful without first becoming professional developers.
What makes the Lemmy outrage especially hypocritical to me is that many people on Lemmy grew up pirating games, software, movies, and music, yet now suddenly act horrified about theft.
Workers in other industries have dealt with automation, outsourcing, offshoring, and layoffs for decades. Programmers laughed a few years ago and insisted AI could never replace them. Now many act furious because it might affect their status and salaries. Gues what? Welcome to the fucking club. Us nonprogramming plebs have always had to deal with that shit.
I see AI as a great equalizer. And I love it!
Yes.
I don’t begrudge the equalized access one bit.
I started when BASIC let average citizens start coding without having to learn Assembler.
I do begrudge that AI is often being sold as a perfect solution to everyone’s problems.
BASIC solved some problems and created some new problems. AI will, too.
