“you know who’s behind it? minnesota,” trump said. “because they’re grossly incompetent. i think the governor’s behind it. i don’t think there was an iranian cyberattack. i think minnesota ought to get its act together.”

he went further, dismissing the notion that iran had the capacity or interest to be involved at all: “they like to say, ‘oh, it was iran.’ iran should be so lucky. iran’s got bigger problems than worrying about minnesota.”

  • Wytch@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    13 days ago

    He has the perfect opportunity to call Iran a terrorist state, justifying escalation and extension of his idiotic war. That’s what Cheney would have done.

    But this is about retribution against his real enemies: Americans who don’t like him. That’s always his first priority, blame someone else.

    Not that he needs an excuse to continue the Iran conflict, it’s not like his ego or intellect will permit him to cut his losses.

  • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Bullshit. I personally worked on the incident that happened to St Paul municipal and water systems last year as the Incident Response Technical lead.

    The threat actors were not Iranian then. They were Russian.

    I personally rebuilt most of their networks, VMware hosts, storage, and servers. The majority of the VMware environments did not have config backups and were running 5 and 6 branches of VMware, only two had 7+.

    I had my team compile a massive set of recommendations for them and I wrote the report. Water Systems specifically. They did not listen to us, apparently. The forensics team also did this.

    They had FBI, national guard (fucking incompetent), and law enforcement (useless) in all meetings.

    If they got into Water, they’ll get back into city and municipal again. I guarantee it.

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I do not. If I were to bet, I would guess it’s the same people or related groups to the last incident.

        Russian state policy is to allow any sort of hacking as long as it’s not aimed at Russian assets. No penalty. These groups just want their bag.

        • Cybersec@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Ok good point. It’s possible also that Russia or China can collab with or act for Iran, or use it as cover as you suggest right.

          • TechLich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 days ago

            I think they’re implying that it’s not actually a nation state threat actor, that Russian cyber criminals looking to exploit systems for money are able to act with impunity so long as they don’t target Russians (hence “want their bag”). Most incidents are financially motivated.

          • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            From my perspective, you’re not wrong. Information sharing is a thing and all of them have a common interest of diminishing USA hegemony.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      … thats… not reassuring.

      … wonderful.

      Yeah, from the outside… Russians makes the most sense. I don’t think China would be this bold, Iran? Probably not skilled enough.

      I… guess it could be possible the Russians are essentially doing it on behalf of Iran, in some way, but… probably no real way to prove that either way.

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        China doesn’t target low-value entities like this. They’re going after bigger fish and using much more subversive methods. They deploy people on the ground. Look into the Chinese Police Stations that are all over the USA, Canada, and other countries. Illegal AF.

        China gets people to go work for large corps, government entities, and other places, and has them extract data that way.

        Also, what’s with your use of ellipses? I don’t understand.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I (over)use them to indicate pauses or hesitation.

          Stylistic flair.

          I didn’t realize the Chinese used so many … on the ground facilitators… that’s a very aggressive tactic.

          That does make sense though, all you’ve said.

          I was aware that yes, they typically went for… basically extremely high value data… i would think that persistent presence, or, almost that, basically, in essentially many state municipal systems… would essentially be a strategic weapon/tool… didn’t think they’d be so bold as to flip all that on, now. I’d have figured they’d wait for a more specific, opportune moment.

          But from what you’re saying… sounds like they’re mostly interested in acquisition, extraction.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13 days ago

    They’re incompetent, and they did a multistate cyberattack. You’re “competent” but couldn’t successfully hold a state fair.

  • ignirtoq@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 days ago

    This seems like a strange site. Why does it not use capital letters? My eyesight is not the best, so it makes it harder to see the end/start of a sentence. And no names are capitalized either?

    And every time it uses the phrase “minnesota water cyberattack trump iran” it just links to its own homepage, which isn’t a news organization of any kind, but a marketing consulting agency? What is going on? This absolutely does not seem like a reliable source.

  • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    The attack was only on blue states and we’re supposed to think it wasn’t conservative domestic terrorists again?

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    You know what the rest of us don’t care about? Any thoughts that pass through your vapid narcissistic pedophile criminal mind that doesn’t understand a single goddamned thing about reality.

  • fyf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Someone please make a Wikipedia page detailing the Minnesota cyber attack.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Hey lets ask the demented rapist idiot what he thinks about a complex issue!

    Great job, sewer news.