“To protect kids online”… By making then fundamentally less safe
Good thing the GrapheneOS foundation is based in Toronto.
And even if it was US based is FOSS software with plenty of forks.
Literally the only way to enforce this is great firewall the United States, and honestly good luck convincing the oligarchs who profit from global markets to allow such a thing
I’m sorry. I don’t share your optimism about the oligarchs doing what’s right. It worked for russia and china to up up a great firewall, although they are both capitalist societies.
It’s less of doing what’s right and more what benefits their bottom line. And an isolated US where all economic activity must go through a State approval doesn’t
Only a matter of time until it comes to Canada
So it moves somewhere else. Switzerland. Iceland. Etc.
The EU will probably be after Canada with how many times they’ve tried chat control
Von der Leyen is the chief architect behind construction of the Fourth Reich. Neither Switzerland nor Iceland are in the EU.
In principle you could develop distributed in the underground, using anonymous donations.
Bipartisan bill to fingerprint everyone with two data points would destroy privacy for all Internet users.
FTFY.
FIFY:
Bipartisan Anti-Anonymity Bill Uses Child Protection as Beard.
I will gladly go to court for it, I hope the developers feel the same.
I guess I’m an outlaw?
Outlaw GOS in the US.
Color me absolutely shocked that another “attempt” to “protect the children” simply is a brazen step towards more surveillance.
My mom, by no means a political person, is convinced that the government is recording our conversations in real time. I feel that’s a bit early but I can’t really fault her and I doubt it is far off…
