One rule: don’t talk about Marx in this thread.

Here’s some interesting people to read on:

  • Pierre Leroux
  • Robert Owen
  • Rosa Luxemburg
  • E. P. Thompson
  • Ned Ludd
  • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You don’t have to reference anyone to discuss Socialism. Frankly I think it’s a little masturbatory to mention the big names except when discussing them specifically.

    • DegradationDenial@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I personally have found it to be dangerous to talk about socialism without knowing if the person is a staunch ML or can converse about their critics.

      Like wise if the ownership of the socialism definition and revisionism like Democratic Socialism, Anarchic Socialism is associated or excluded.

      Stepping into socialist theory it seemed like Manifesto of the Communist Party was the one and only way, joining lemmy.ml seemed to reaffirm that but then one listens to Socialists from a different media thier ideas are far less strict. I’m assuming they’ve read other books and pamphlets by other people.

      • DegradationDenial@feddit.nlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ugg it’s obvious that conversation on this platform has no merit when people can downvote you without reason and total anonymity. It creates the perfect environment for theories of a meddling of 50c army or similar, with no meaningful inclusion.

        Mods are doing too little against this cult like behaviour.