The hilarious thing about this to me is that the reason the US Army became one of the most powerful forces on the planet for
betterworse or worse is because the US Army was thoroughly beaten in war by the Indigenous peoples of the United States and it never really forgot why, this is the reason the US military was so much more powerful than similar European militaries for decades, there was an institutional through line about war being NOT ABOUT soldiers in neat lines with badass manly uniforms lining up to die in a properly masculine way… which is what people like Pete Hegseth are terminally obsessed with …and so in 2026 to then say that the First Nations needs to be conquered vastly misunderstands the reality of power while leading into a still ongoing Genocide of Indigenous peoples taking place in Canada and the US.If the US Army hadn’t realized how First Nations conquered them it would have never been so unilaterally powerful for so long as it was, so take it as a warning and a call to human rights, the First Nations have to be lived with and celebrated in our cultures, not conquered lest we will be destroyed as surely as “they” will (they being our neighbors).
To most people this sounds like tacky jingoism disguised as a celebration of Indigenous peoples but I am dead serious when I say there is a very good reason the US Army decided to name its helicopters, The Apache needs no explanation, the Huey (including Cobra attack helicopters) is a nickname for the Iroquois, the Black Hawk is NOT named after a bird but after a specific Indigenous person by the name of Black Hawk who played a major role in US history, the Chinook, Lakota, Commanche, Kiowa, Cheyenne and Cheyenne II the list goes on.

This is who the Black Hawk helicopter is named after, it wasn’t named to be evoke a cool, badass stealthy bird of prey or something, it was named for a specific Indigenous person because the namers believed this tool evoked the nature of power that Black Hawk had, which specifically was not just for violence.

Consider the fact that Europeans had an immense amount of time to figure out how to use the horse best for war and within a short handful of decades the Indigenous peoples of North America learned how to use horses far better and kick Europe’s ass by exploiting maneuver and the capacity to concentrate force with speed that the horse provided. The modern day concept of air cavalry is a direct response and integration of that idea. The Cheyenne II tiltrotor is a direct embodiment of how the Indigenous peoples of North America understood the horse brought to its most technologically advanced context yet, but the technology is details it is about what the “tool” is for, and that was defined by the intellect of Indigenous warriors in North America.
edit Note the US Marines notably do not name their helicopters after Indigenous people’s or tribes which is why they tend to also have dumb names like the V-22 Osprey or King Stallion… and it does also reflect on the doctrinal differences between how the US Marines perceive themselves and how the US Army perceives itself in terms of war.
https://www.army.mil/article/240476/why_army_helicopters_have_native_american_names
According to the museum official, Howze wasn’t a fan of the names of the first two helicopters – Hoverfly and Dragonfly. So, he laid out instructions for naming the helicopters after their abilities.
Howze said since the choppers were fast and agile, they would attack enemy flanks and fade away, similar to the way the tribes on the Great Plains fought during the aforementioned American Indian Wars. He decided the next helicopter produced – the well-known H-13 of “M.A.S.H.” fame – would be called the Sioux in honor of the Native Americans who fought Army Soldiers in the Sioux Wars and defeated the 7th Cavalry Regiment at the Battle of Little Bighorn.
Again I don’t say all of this to indulge in trying to disguise military jingoism under a superficial appreciation for Indigenous peoples, I am not defending the military industrial complex or the US Army, I am just pointing out the naming scheme here was very intentional as a reference to the people those people looked up to as the most skilled and intelligent at war and adaption, which were Indigenous tribes. The people high up in the US Army who truly understood war DEMANDED their helicopters be named after Indigenous tribes as a reminder of their power and what we learn from it.

https://www.neh.gov/article/code-talkers-were-americas-secret-weapon-world-war-ii
There were also the Navajo Code Talkers
I had someone tell me on the fediverse that having a diversity of languages is inefficient and we should celebrate everyone beginning to speak the same language and just you know just use AI to handwave away any friction blah blah blah… to which I responded a diversity of language makes you more powerful as a society… to which they confidently retorted something to the effect of “when has a niche language ever been powerful in war or otherwise?”.
It was very satisfying linking to the story of the Navajo Code Talkers, especially because they survived, this wasn’t a Tragic Indian Story, they served, they were respected for their immense power and skill at war, and then they went on to live among us even as we still yet could not find it in ourselves not to be racist against them… but no matter that speaks badly upon us not them because there they are in that picture, alive and living which is not just a symbol of hope, it is a symbol of their power and we should fear to forget it.
If you think we are weak because we speak different languages and because one idea or command is not necessarily immediately comprehended and accepted by everyone in the group due to vast tectonic differences and movements of people within society… then you are only admitting your own weakness… in war, in peace, in art, in comedic vision, in love… in everything.
Canada having indigenous languages as official ones would protect us against imperial powers since it would be harder for the elites to understand what we’re thinking.
Having Indigenous languages as official also helps underscore in monument that all art is translation and all translation is always fundamentally a lie, which is why the act of becoming skilled in translation is a process of learning to listen and knowing how to best twist the lies you make into the most harmless/loving approximation of the truth.
This idea that translation is a general problem of logic to be solved with algorithm, computer, beaucracy or AI is supremely dangerous and it is just fascism defined with the narrow terms of language.
Obviously First Nations should be the ones writing signage, books and documents in their own languages.
Yes of course, could it accurately be described as representative of their language anymore if the agency is taken from them in the processing of recording it? Can we even know what the language is now not at some historical period in the past if we do not empower the native speakers of the language to flourish?
Language is a living thing!
That is why it’s so crucial for elders to get decent healthcare so they can teach the young.
The BC cons are full of corrupt racists who will gladly raise your bills.
Wtf is going on in that province? I never knew BC cons were worse than SK.
Mike Hicks, saying “in law, we have to conquer or sign a treaty with the First Nations!”
Lorne Doerkson, voted to repeal BC’s Human Rights Code, abolish the Human Rights Tribunal and terminate the BC Human Rights Commissioner. Repeal the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act as his top priority. Refused to elaborate on how he will “stand against hate.”
Cons are cons, no matter where they are.
Disgusting display of white nationalism
In law, we have to conquer or sign a treaty with the First Nations. We just arrived, we settled in, and we didn’t do any of it. And that’s why we have to have these treaties and we’re going to get them.
Actually, we extensively did both in history, we decided to give them the land that can’t support a population and kept the good lands for ourselves, that’s why we outnumbered them now, and those that refused were just killed.
In law, we have to conquer or sign a treaty with the First Nations
False dichotomy… you dont HAVE to conquer anyone…
BUT
And that’s why we have to have these treaties
He seems to be advocating for the treaty path, so it seems like his words are being taken out of context for ragebait
I’ll admit, dunno who this guy is or his history so perhaps i shouldnt interpret his words so charitably…
Exactly - rhetoric like this just shows how much they actually know about what they’re saying.
No wonder indigenous are nearly universally turning against maple MAGA politics and separatism.
It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that first nation’s people aren’t supportive of the racists who deny their right to exist.
Jesus fucking Christ I would hope it draws criticism.
It should draw the police. That’s a terroristic threat.
the police are the terrorists
Obvs but idk what else we can do atm.
Bud, go home and cut your own hair some more.
trying to upstage alberta.






