• MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who could’ve guessed an aircraft with a primary goal of dodging current safety regulation would be unsafe?

      • Montagge@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That happens at every technical business. It gets founded by passionate engineers. Then as they retire or leave they get replaced by business people that only care that number go up.

        • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          That wasn’t a big issue back when businesses could fail, but a giant like Boeing going under today is nearly unthinkable. If we’d let these giants die they could be replaced by companies that actually care about their products. This is a symptom of late stage capitalism and nothing less.

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is the same Boeing Max that was approved during trump’s run FAA? There was that strange thing that a year before it crashed, out of nowhere he was saying that there were no crashes during his presidency, as if that wasn’t normal.