• DacoTaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I legit wonder what would happen if this argument is used ( in a professional way by a professional lawyer ) in a court of law. Like, could this legit be argued to be the same?

        • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          NAL but technically speaking Ubisoft would lose because they would be unable to prove that they were deprived of anything or anything was appropriated from them with their current stance. Realistically they would just pivot and find some other nonsense to try, like claiming a theft of their computer server’s processing power everytime a pirated game accessed their lobby or some other nonsense that would barely fly, but fly none the less.

          • derpgon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What if the game was purely offline? Also, how can a pirated game access online lobbies? The last time I pirated a game was because Epic had a BL3 exclusive. And I couldn’t matchmake.

            I wonder who would have to prove what. Ubi, that they missed profit (because you’d want to buy the game and didn’t) or the player (who’d argue he wouldn’t ever buy it anyway).

            • mateomaui@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s a number of cracked games now with online play enabled, you just need to make a burner Steam (etc) account to use it so your main one with purchases doesn’t get nuked if they catch on.