• Sem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure that lemmy users are different in this from user of Reddit/HackerNews/Facebook/etc.

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read the TLDR bot at least…

    Seems like that gives 90% of the relevant info, then I view the article if there’s anything missing.

    Not that it makes a difference, my opinions are formed before I even read the title. I’m dug in, and I’ll never change 😎

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always read the top comment first, because often they have a better article or explain why the article is misleading

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I go top comment(s) to see if the article is not clickbait. Then I’ll read the summary to see if it’s any good. Then I’ll go to the article itself if those check out.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what if that comment is instead downvoted to death because it goes against the community opinions?

    • zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m dug in, and I’ll never change 😎

      'Cause we don’t have to! 'Cause we’re AMERICANS! We won’t change our minds on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before us.

      Rock, flag, and eagle! Right, li10?

  • hexortor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. modern websites are a pain to navigate with popups, paywall, ads, heavy tracking that slows down navigation, autoplaying video ads etc

    2. modern journalism = let’s just report whatever the person or company says without fact checking, contextualizing or taking a stance. I believe this is done because it takes less effort and because it makes sure that the news org doesn’t anger any of the persons/organizations it has tides with (for ads or direct funding)

    The comments solve both problems, as lemmy is ad- and tracking-free and the people in the comments are mostly real people usually without any vested interests in the things they’re discussing.

    So OBVIOUSLY I only read the comments. I’ll get the content of the article indirectly as it’s being discussed.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also you can use the comments to determine if the article is even worth reading so you don’t accidentally give a click to some hack journalism.

    • silverdraco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is absolutely true. I get more information and understanding from the discussion in the comments than I do the article. Using other platforms I want to read what people are discussing about the article than the article itself. Brings more depth to the conversation and the article.

    • drawerair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When I see a lot of 💩 on the site, I use Firefox’s reader mode.

      archive.md, 12ft.io or the “Bypass paywalls clean” extension for paywalls

      I have Ublock origin to block the tracking.

  • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t want to read the thing. I want to discuss the thing that i didn’t read with other people who didn’t read the thing.

    • Johanno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you read the thing? Because I didn’t and I don’t like your opinion on that topic!

  • knexcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would I read a long, padded, ad-riddled article when I can get a quick and accurate TL;DR in the title and expert commentary in the comments?

  • rando895@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I prefer to only read the top line of a meme then post. And no that’s not a Lemmy user, that’s squidward

    • neo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right!? Everyone but us is so stupid for talking about Lemmy (who ever that is) in here, while this is obviously squidward. Sheeple are so stupid!

  • SteefLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read comments first mostly because a lot of posted articles are behind a paywall or i have to turn off my adblockers and maybe someone posted a tldr

    • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shoot, they won’t just be posting a tl;dr, but a commentary on it, and sometimes really good context from their field or experience. It’s basically the article, but written by a more intelligent journalist who is a part of whatever is being reported on, not just observing from interviews and phone calls (and lame corporate website ‘about us’ pages).

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly - no fluff or dancing around, they get right to the point and make concrete assertions. Then if they’re wrong, people will correct them, and you get a debate that (hopefully) brings up various subtleties and connected issues for a more holistic view.

        Then if I’m still intrigued, I read the source