The targeting of another U.S.-owned commercial ship Wednesday shows the militant group remains intent on continuing its attacks in the face of multiple rounds of U.S. military airstrikes.

The Houthis launched anti-ship ballistic missiles at the U.S.-owned, flagged and operated commercial ship Maersk Detroit as it was transiting the Gulf of Aden, according to a statement from the U.S. Central Command. The U.S. Navy destroyer USS Gravely shot down two missiles and a third fell into the water. There were no indications of damage or injuries in the attack.

The U.S. military has been conducting airstrikes against the Houthis to degrade their capabilities since Jan.11, after several weeks of attacks on commercial ships by the militant group.

  • cooljacob204@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Man tankies just really infest the fediverse. I wish reality was as simple as they like to pretend it is.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Saying that you support the Houthis in their efforts to stop genocide does not mean you agree with everything they stand for.

      You don’t have to unequivocally support a group to encorse one specific action.

        • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maersk said both vessels carried cargo belonging to the U.S. Defense and State Departments, as well as other government agencies, meaning they were “afforded the protection of the U.S. Navy for passage through the strait.”

          Don’t fall for propaganda like a dumbass. These two ships were carrying DOD cargo.

      • supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes cause the houthis are Bear loving kinda of Islamist militia, right. Definitely have never engaged in the same type of actions ever/s

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t recall the Houthis ever blockading the red sea before.

          Somalia had some pirates but that was just literal theft and extortion. And that’s not the Houthis.

          Mind linking what you are talking about?

          • supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a militia islamic militia, do you think they haven’t done the same thing as Israel does to their population, or a subset of their population?

            It’s just a way to grab the attention span of everyone which helps their recruitment.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re really trying to defend israel’s genocide in any possible way. “No they allowed to stop genocide, they are the bad guys!”

              I’m not here to simp for whatever war crimes they did internally. Just this specific action isn’t one you should denounce.

              There was a Houthi spokesperson on BBC. They told him the same thing. His response was very simple.

              If other groups want to enhance their popularity by stopping genocide they’re very welcome to do so.

              How about you go stop israel’s genocide if you don’t want the Houthi’s to do it?

              https://youtu.be/z4HguzMRW1M

          • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Somalian Pirates were actually often protecting their territorial waters from foreign opportunists plundering in the collapse of the Somalian government. The framing as pirates only works in the sense that these weren’t state-driven fleets, but rather civilian driven in order to protect their livelihoods against corporate raiders.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just checked the list of ships they attacked. You are right that they are almost all cargo but there was a cruise ship in there

              Seabourn Spirit, a luxury cruise ship carrying 210 crew members and passengers, was attacked by pirates off the coast of Somalia.[12] Riding in two small speedboats, the pirates fired at the ship with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but the crew drove them off with a water hose and a long range acoustic device.

              Do you have any good articles or videos explaining the situation with the Somali pirates? I might be wrong about it and would love to know what the actual deal was.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man pinkos just really infest the fediverse. I wish reality was as simple as they like to pretend it is.