it isn’t, because teachers aren’t just any kind of job, they teach children - naturally vulnerable people. Therefore, we have to limit what kinds of experiences they’re exposed to. Because of the way communities work, once this kind of thing becomes public knowledge, everyone knows.
Therefore, there is a risk that children at the school could view the kind of product this person is selling. This is the kind of experience that with children we should limit how and when they’re exposed to.
We can’t garuntee that every parent is able or willing to ensure that their child isn’t exposed to this, and a teacher at the school has increased that risk by producing such content - again because of how communities work, this makes it more likely that such ‘scandelous’ material would be viewed by children.
A teacher is also a role model, and an authority figure. In any school (that’s properly run), if a child said for example ‘I want to be a pornographer when I grow up’ or ‘I want to be a drug dealer when I grow up’ (or the childlike equivalent) that would immediately raise a warning flag and be investigated, because of the innate vulnerability of children, and the potential risk and harm that could come from such activities, and that it just is not a normal thing for a child to want or say. If you have a teacher who promotes being a pornographer, it makes this kind of process complicated. While the teacher might not do so ‘as a teacher’, once it is public knowledge, everyone knows, and children will end up knowing too.
So the best way to avoid any risks and harms, is to say to teachers: ‘you can’t be a teacher and a pornographer’. Maybe there’s nothing bad about doing porn, but no institution entrusted by the community with the care of their children will accept a pornographer teacher.
There’s also nothing bad about teachers not being allowed to be pornographers, or drug dealers. Any teacher must be fully aware that if such activities become public knowledge they will be fired - likely for breech of contract. I doubt this was a surprise to the teacher in question.
There’s also nothing bad about teachers not being allowed to be pornographers, or drug dealers. Any teacher must be fully aware that if such activities become public knowledge they will be fired - likely for breech of contract. I doubt this was a surprise to the teacher in question.
No, that is wack, get the fuck out of here
Fucking hellworld ass priorities and perspective
Teachers are only allowed to be asexual, atheist, gray blobs who are must not be allowed to exist as their own human person and must conform to the deeply fucked up values of our society
You going to say that teachers who have attended pride/ kink parades should be fired too, next?
it isn’t, because teachers aren’t just any kind of job, they teach children - naturally vulnerable people. Therefore, we have to limit what kinds of experiences they’re exposed to. Because of the way communities work, once this kind of thing becomes public knowledge, everyone knows.
Therefore, there is a risk that children at the school could view the kind of product this person is selling. This is the kind of experience that with children we should limit how and when they’re exposed to.
We can’t garuntee that every parent is able or willing to ensure that their child isn’t exposed to this, and a teacher at the school has increased that risk by producing such content - again because of how communities work, this makes it more likely that such ‘scandelous’ material would be viewed by children.
A teacher is also a role model, and an authority figure. In any school (that’s properly run), if a child said for example ‘I want to be a pornographer when I grow up’ or ‘I want to be a drug dealer when I grow up’ (or the childlike equivalent) that would immediately raise a warning flag and be investigated, because of the innate vulnerability of children, and the potential risk and harm that could come from such activities, and that it just is not a normal thing for a child to want or say. If you have a teacher who promotes being a pornographer, it makes this kind of process complicated. While the teacher might not do so ‘as a teacher’, once it is public knowledge, everyone knows, and children will end up knowing too.
So the best way to avoid any risks and harms, is to say to teachers: ‘you can’t be a teacher and a pornographer’. Maybe there’s nothing bad about doing porn, but no institution entrusted by the community with the care of their children will accept a pornographer teacher.
There’s also nothing bad about teachers not being allowed to be pornographers, or drug dealers. Any teacher must be fully aware that if such activities become public knowledge they will be fired - likely for breech of contract. I doubt this was a surprise to the teacher in question.
No, that is wack, get the fuck out of here
Fucking hellworld ass priorities and perspective
Teachers are only allowed to be asexual, atheist, gray blobs who are must not be allowed to exist as their own human person and must conform to the deeply fucked up values of our society
You going to say that teachers who have attended pride/ kink parades should be fired too, next?