• SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s called “being privately owned” or “not having to suck up to shareholders”

    • Jackiedoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup hit the nail on the head. Not only can he make decisions that are risky that don’t pay off he is also 100 percent legally in his right to make decisions that lose the company money. If he feels it pushes the industry in the right direction.