QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down10cross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up1100arrow-down1imageDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlQueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square106fedilinkcross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoI stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoDo you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThe question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI guess that’s a yes lol
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThis conversation has gone all over the place, I don’t know what point you were originally trying to make.
I stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
Do you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
The question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
I guess that’s a yes lol
This conversation has gone all over the place, I don’t know what point you were originally trying to make.