• Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Deportion is not abuse, why on Earth would it be?

    I think we have fundementally different ideas of what abuse and deportation are

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Deportion is not abuse

      The recipients of DACA are young people who have grown up as Americans, identify themselves as Americans, and many speak only English and have no memory of or connection with the country where they were born.

      You would send someone to a country they have no memory of, no connection to, and cannot speak the language and not call it abuse? They’re not being sent home. They’re effectively being sent to a foreign country.

      • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly. That’s why it’s abusive. It’d be like sending a random conservative to Hungary. Though CPAC attendees may love Hungary, I doubt they’d like to be sent there forcefully when they identify as an American through and through.

          • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            It is sending a citizen of that country back to their country.

            When you say “their” country, what do you mean?

              • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                The only reason I’m a citizen of American is because of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution:

                Section 1.

                All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

                That is, the law of the U.S. defines my status as a citizen of the U.S. by virtue of my being born here.

                Still, there are four other ways to become a citizen of the U.S.

                • by naturalization
                • by marriage
                • through parents
                • through the military

                These pathways are all outlined in various laws.

                Again, the status of immigrants who are now citizens is determined by law.

                I said earlier that “the ‘We support a legal path to citizenship for immigrants that go through the proper channels’ people do not, in fact, support a legal path to citizenship for them”. That is, Republicans generally refused to grant citizenship to immigrants by passing the DREAM Act. In their inability to govern, they did not pass a law.

                You make it seem as if citizenship is an inherent characteristic of being born in the U.S. It is not. Repeal the 14th Amendment, and birthright citizenship goes away. Change the immigration laws, and lesser or greater numbers of immigrants can be granted citizenship. You’re right, “They are not citizens of America.” But they could have been (and could be) at the stroke of pen. It is the law that determines citizenship. While I’m both an American citizen and identify as American, dreamers only identify as American. It’s only because of xenophobia that dreamers are not citizens.