• 1 Post
  • 296 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle













  • I agree with both statements (and so do facts). I am trying to sound out why both actions are occurring simultaneously.

    My thought comes from a place thinking about the logic. Is it something like, “we don’t care if a handful (or even more) die in child birth, so long as we have a huge surge in fresh new population.”

    Maybe I am trying to understand logical reasoning that isn’t present.


  • A real world response to denied claims and prior authorizations is to ask a few qualifying questions during the appeals process. Submit claims and prior authorizations with the full expectation that they will be denied, because the shareholders must have caviar, right?

    Anecdotal case in-point:

    You desperately need a knee surgery to prevent a potential worse condition. The Prior Authorization is denied.

    You have the right to appeal that ruling, and you can ask what are the credentials for the doctor who gave the ruling. If, per se, a psychologist says that a knee surgery isn’t medically necessary, you can ask them which specialized training they have received in the field of psychiatry that brought them to that conclusion.


  • So why push to prevent abortion?

    Real question, no troll.

    Kill people by preventing care on one side. Prevent people from unwanted pregnancy on the other. Maybe they want a rapid turnover in population because the older generations aren’t compliant.

    With the massive changes to the Department of Education, maybe they have plans to severely dumb down the next few generations into maleable, controllable wage slaves.

    Maybe I just answered my own question.