• 0 Posts
  • 501 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle













  • This is the first time I’ve heard of Scuttlebutt. Thank you for the introduction.

    For your multiple-device problem, I would suggest trying Syncthing. It allows you keep folders synced between devices over a local network. I use it for a very similar application to what you are describing:

    Logsec is a journal/note-taking software that stores each entry as it’s own markdown file. I use it on my phone, laptop and desktop, and want to have all my notes synced between devices. I could put the folder of markdown files on a cloud server, but choose not to. Instead, I setup a link between each device’s Logsec folder through Syncthing.

    Now I can add or update notes on my phone when out in public, and when I return home and reconnect to my WiFi it automatically updates the other devices on the network. Also, when editing the markdown files on my desktop, the updates are synced to my phone nearly instantaneously.

    I expect this method would work very well with Scuttlebutt due to it’s similar offline nature.



  • My point is not that heavy volume is required for this to happen, and it’s strange how you could jump to that conclusion.

    Instead, a higher rate of fire gives more opportunities to witness anomolies between shots, within a given time. Combine this with tracers, and now you can easily follow these paths, before and after each bullet hits it’s initial target.

    With a 6000 round-per-minute minigun, even if you only see one tracer bounce away every second, that demonstrates a 1% chance for every round to deflect and hit somewhere unintended.

    Considering that the tracers are normally spaced out on a belt, with other rounds between them; the sample size can be reduced further, and this chance becomes multiple times higher.

    When yearly machine-gun shoots were still hosted in Knob Creek, Kentucky, the range staffed people left and right of the firing line with fire extinguishers. After the ‘finale’ occurred and weapons were cleared, they would run out onto the hills beside the range.

    With multiple miniguns firing alongside other automatics, and the insane number of rounds fired downrange, it was inevitable to have more than enough hot tracers land in the brush of these hills to start multiple small fires.

    The possibility of ricochet injury is simply matter of probability. Sure, I would never claim this is the most probable explanation, but it’s silly to claim there’s absolutely no chance this could happen.


  • I started writing a response earlier, but quickly realized how hard it was to research strapon and chastity use while at work. 😅 Now that I’ve had time to look into a specific term for this, it appears to be “reverse pegging”.

    Given the way you defined your personal root for the term pegging, it sounds like reverse pegging may still fit this mold. Personally, I feel it requires much more submission from a man than regular pegging and has a larger power-dynamic swing.

    Anal penetration can feel great for both sexes; however, even more so for men due to their prostate. This combined with the ability to still stroke yourself while receiving anal leads to amazing orgasms. However, by reversing who wears the toy, and restricting actual penis use through chastity, you eliminate both of those sources of pleasure. Also, there is an opportunity to use a larger toy than the man’s own penis (because why not), and this can add an extra layer of humiliation/kink. Meanwhile, the woman can get pleasure from any possible penis shape/size, which can also remain hard indefinitely.

    I feel that “reverse pegging” takes significant submission from the man, while the woman holds control of the power dynamic (and quite possibly the keys to his cage). Alternatively, I see vanilla pegging as an opportunity for the man to receive extra stimulation, while their partner forgoes penetrative pleasure. It’s hard for me to understand why men would be opposed to extra stimulation and intense orgasms, so I don’t see much (if any) sacrifice.

    I’ve always used the term “pegging” regardless of the genders involved and never gave it much thought. You seem much more schooled on these subjects so I was curious how other power-dynamics may factor into meeting the word’s traditional meaning. I appreciate the new perspective, and hadn’t previously considered how using a strapon without coming “outta the box with a meat rod” would also be such a major influence on one’s perceived power in the bedroom.