Lol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_School_UFO_incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varginha_UFO_incident

Sure, but that is clearly a door blocked by the shower.

The green rectangle-shaped thing that starts at the floor and has a border framing it?

I’m still using a Galaxy S9+ from 2018! And yes, I still get over a day’s worth of battery life with the original battery.

It’s stunning that you jump to “subservient” at the idea of someone going down on someone else. I know I’m melted pool of “yes please, I’m all yours” when someone is going down on me.

If you’re a horny hypersexual, and you see a stunning female figure like Bill Clinton in a magestic blue dress and red heels, is it that much of a stretch to think you might get all up in that?

I’d love to know the full story behind this painting from Epstein’s NYC residence.

Please read the OP; this post is for voting. Discussion should happen in the linked posts.

They did!

👍

No

It’s already prohibited. This case is aiming to change that and permit marijuana users to own guns.

You are exactly right in how this law has been used. However, this case is looking to overturn that and set a precidedent for allowing marijuana users to own guns.

Extended security updates are available. This can be activated for free using Microsoft Activation Scripts.

Microsoft tech support has been repeatedly caught using these scripts to resolve support tickets for license issues. (https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/microsoft-support-cracks-windows-for-customer-after-activation-fails/) Also, the open source MAS code is hosted on Microsoft-owned Github, so they are appearantly not very concerned with people taking advantage of this exploit.

If you go this route, please also see the FAQ entry here. There is currently a glitch with commercial ESU keys (which this uses) and Windows Update will continue to claim that your device will no longer receive security updates. This is also effecting W10 LTSC systems. However, you can verify that the license key is active through Command Prompt and instructions are given in the FAQ.

It’s already illegal. This is a challenge to restore those rights.

It’s all the same option. It activates years 1-6 to the best of it’s ability, but admits the years 4-6 are not yet fully released

The icing on the cake is that the open-source MAS code is hosted on Github, which Microsoft owns. Between this and their support use, they’re practically endorsing it!

Microsoft Activation Scripts has a method to activate three years of extended security updates on Windows 10 for free.

Bonus: Microsoft tech support has been repeatedly caught using these scripts to resolve support tickets for license issues. (https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/microsoft-support-cracks-windows-for-customer-after-activation-fails/)

Edit: If you go this route, please also see the FAQ entry here. There is currently a glitch with commercial ESU keys (which this uses) and Windows Update will continue to claim that your device will no longer receive security updates. This is also effecting W10 LTSC systems. However, you can verify that the license key is active through Command Prompt and instructions are given in the FAQ.

FYI, Microsoft Activation Scripts has a method to activate extended security updates on Windows 10 machines. This should give you at least another year of updates.

E: It appears that this gives an extra 3 years of updates. I’ll be trying it out tonight on my last W10 machine.

Edit2: If you go this route (as I just did), please also see the FAQ entry here. There is currently a glitch with commercial ESU keys (which this exploit uses) and Windows Update will continue to claim that your device will no longer receive security updates. This is also effecting W10 LTSC systems. However, you can verify that the license key is active through Command Prompt and instructions are given in the FAQ.

Flash fill is not the result of user dragging. It’s an automatic prediction done by Excel while you type. Therefore, the commonly horrible output is not the result of user error.

I don’t think this contradicts their point. Firstly, saying something is a concern is not the same as saying there are no other concerns. It’s not an exclusionary statement.

Secondly, I would expect that every country with these capabilities is tracking every satellite they can find. Of course this is going to include adverserial nations.