![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8800b6b6-0bf4-46da-a359-bca088870729.png)
…or I don’t care about fitting into 2 unhealthy Internet stereotypes, and neither should you. Touch grass.
…or I don’t care about fitting into 2 unhealthy Internet stereotypes, and neither should you. Touch grass.
Gotta say, that is the most technical picture ever posted from lemmynsfw
Feminism is driven primarily by, and meant primarily for, women. Men (and nonbinary people) can occasionally benefit from it, but they don’t commonly have a say in the way it develops.
Antisexism encompasses all people, and everyone has an equal voice as long as it calls for equality. It makes no sense to break it down to smaller units if everyone’s on the same page in that no one should be discriminated against. Men can be on the watch for cases of discrimination against women, and vice versa.
MRA (as in patriarchal men calling for male dominance and against feminism) are not welcome here. Coming from the men’s perspective, MRA may occasionally raise very real issues of men, which can cause the intersection of topics between them and the community; the problem is, many if not most of the MRA folks don’t want equality and also think of patriarchy as the magic pill to solve their issues, issues that are often caused by it in the first place.
You can look into men’s issues from the men’s perspective without encroaching on women’s rights in any way, shape or form, and this is one part of the multidirectional message the community tries to send.
The false dichotomy of “feminism or patriarchy” commonly leaves the opinions and unique struggles of non-patriarchal men out of the picture, and nonbinary people are straight up invisible in this conversation.
USSR (and China, too) didn’t even have communism. It had socialism and strived for the communist world in the future.
We know everyone immediately followed the profile to see the boobs, don’t we?
(They are nice btw)
Here’s my guess, aside from highlighted token issues:
We all know LLMs train on human-generated data. And when we ask something like “how many R’s” or “how many L’s” is in a given word, we don’t mean to count them all - we normally mean something like “how many consecutive letters there are, so I could spell it right”.
Yes, the word “strawberry” has 3 R’s. But what most people are interested in is whether it is “strawberry” or “strawbery”, and their “how many R’s” refers to this exactly, not the entire word.
Good, let porn migrate to https://lemmynsfw.com/ - finally more good content on Lemmy
And trans people are always welcome here! Direct them over to Lemmy as much as you can
And that’s how glory shit began…
The point of the OP is not that we should abandon science in the name of consumerism.
It is that for-profit entities that happen to drive scientific communication put profits above all else, including, ironically, scientific communication.
Scientists should not be expected to pay the price of a car to have their articles published, that discourages sharing important discoveries where they can be noted. And the worst part - there’s nothing causing it but greed.
If you want a more comprehensive overview of your traffic and the ability to set firewall rules to block specific sites, I found Safing Portmaster to be a great option.
You also get filter lists, ability to tweak connections made by different apps, and, as a paid option, connect to a Tor-like network where every app van be designated its own exit node, at the speed of about 60mbits/s last time I checked (currently not using this option).
Exactly my thoughts lol
Let’s not get astray here.
The reason El Salvador stopped using Bitcoin as a legal tender is not because it’s some sort of failed experiment (it had issues, but still), but due to continuous pressure of IMF interested in maintaining a US dollar-centric economy.
El Salvador is reliant on US dollars in its economy, which puts it under heavy US influence. Knowing Salvadoran currency wouldn’t be strong, Nayib Bukele suggested an alternative option - risky, volatile, but free from pressure of other countries and strongly appreciating in the long run. IMF didn’t like it, and that’s where we are.
So, when you cheer Bitcoin not being legal tender anymore, you also cheer US and IMF projecting power over the country.
Joke’s on you, I have a trackpoint on my Dell Latitude
This kind of attack is currently hard to mitigate as it comes from different accounts and different servers. Maybe there’s a way to filter incoming messages by keywords?
Otherwise, this is just an automatic bot, you can safely ignore it.
Aside from grooming, manipulation etc. there are also such things as general trends and societal pressures.
As men are, on average, caring less of their children, women have harder time finding male partners that would do enough of it, and it gets normalized. As it does so, society starts to see women who want an equal partner in terms of child care as too picky and unrealistic, and indeed, it might be hard to find a partner that fits this criteria along with other ones any person has.
It’s important to remember that finding a good partner is hard for everyone.
Earlier times featured slavery, neverending wars everywhere, and a lot of other sources of completely man-made misery.
Now we got to understand all lives matter, sudden deaths of people are perceived as a big tragedy, yet men are still less grieved upon.
The goal of the community is to look into issues from all sides, and it would be unfair to overlook the issue of the so-called “second shift”, especially considering Germany is a bit more traditional compared to many neighboring countries in that regard.
Glad it’s noticed!
The thing is, using the gun for killing is exactly the correct one. That’s the intended purpose. Then you may threat to use it correctly as a means of protection.
But there are other ways. Gun rights are almost universally revoked throughout Europe, for example, and barely anyone fears for their close ones, because of a working police and professional army, as well as, exactly, less access to guns that could be used to perpetrate violence.
As the result, banning guns normally leads to a decrease in the number of homicides and assaults.