

100% agree. Coming up with a word that amounts to “I consoom X artform” is ridiculous. It pushes discussions of the artform away from the people who actually produces the art, whether direct production as in the artists or indirect production in the sense of the workers who make it possible for the artists to even produce the art (for film, this would be the stuntpeople, workers in charge of creating the set, makeup people, catering staff, and so on). Instead, the light is shined upon various bickering gatekeeping consoomers.















He references Chinese philosophical ideas and texts much more than anarchist ideas and concepts to give you an idea of how little anarchism factors into his work. And like every single Chinese philosopher in existence, his works make more sense after reading Confucian text.