
That sounds like an interesting side effect

That sounds like an interesting side effect

Which is perfectly fine

Any particular reason for that? It seems to be quite the common choice for breakfast

It could also be that they smeared toothpaste all over their face


No, no, it’s for the games we will surely get in the future. They are just making sure we have it available already


First time can be forgiven if it’s a good ad, but anything after that will increasingly ruin my image of your product
Very true, but be careful not to end up in an echo chamber
Unfortunately that is very true


No matter how good you are at this, it will always cost at least a second and in life threatening situations I was taught that every second counts
I don’t know about other people, but I myself would like to one day build a snowman and run it over. Something about driving through a snow pile and making it “explode” just sits right with me. Would never run someone else’s snowman over though, as they built it for their own reasons.
So for someone who has a microwave that only works in minutes and actual seconds, meaning 59 is the highest my seconds can go, before the minute counter is increased. Do these microwaves just work in terms of 100 seconds? So if you input 10:00 it’s not actually 10 minutes but rather 1000 seconds, meaning it’s now 16:40 on a “correct” microwave?


Does this mean my first review has to be a 3+ star one or does it only start after, say 5 reviews? I’m okay with either tbh


Are you saying France has vacation days, holidays and 15 days of holiday you can take whenever? Cause Denmark has 25 vacation days and 5-10 (Depending on what days 24+25+26+31/12 and 1/1 falls on and if you have the 24th and 31st of December off) holidays, so a total of 30-35 days off, meaning guaranteed 5 weeks whenever you want and 1-2 weeks of national holidays.

I’m glad that AI has not reached the stage of “if the internet disappeared” yet, because I work in IT and I don’t think I could get through a workday without the internet, but for AI I wouldn’t notice a difference, as all it does is transcribe my conversations, which I already do manually anyway.
I suppose that depends on how pedantic you want to be, cause based on how I read it, you need to “solve” the real answer, which is “c) 0%“, due to the paradoxical situation and then figure out what the chance of picking that correct answer is, if you were to randomly chose one of the 4 options, so either of the 25% options should be correct to mark as a chosen answer and not chosen randomly.
But yes, 25% is not equal to 0%, however English is a lovely language


Fair point.


Seems weird to resign if you know the allegations are false. But he deserves the benefit of the doubt, so poor guy for having to face these allegations
Well wouldn’t the correct answer for us to mark be 25% then? As we aren’t marking it randomly but we are specifically choosing it, therefore you have a 25% random chance to pick 0% which makes us marking a 25% answer correct


I agree, but what’s really weird for me is this part:
he wouldn’t say whether a firearm has been recovered from the fire-damaged residence
Yet the autopsies show that they were all shot. I imagine that the autopsies also show that he was the one to do it based on time of death, but odd that the article doesn’t present that evidence.
Well they said “click the first link”