• 26 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 27th, 2025

help-circle








  • He does a good job of illuminating it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTlUyS-T-_4

    His basic message is that rich people own assets; everyone else operates with money. Every time there is inflation, like when countries borrowed massive amounts of cash during 2020, money becomes worth less (prices for things go up) while assets maintain their value, by going up in dollar value.

    There is an argument that Labour NZ and Democrats US are more neoliberal than left and their policies are largely based around giving subsidies or aid in a way that increases demand for things which drives up the price. One example of this is “University for Everyone” that was started during the Clinton era in the 90s. On the face of it, it sounds like a really positive idea. Unfortunately, when everyone had money for college, the price of tuition skyrocketed. Another way to approach this would have been to build state-owned schools that offered cheaper tuition.

    In New Zealand we do similar things, like the accomodation subsidy. We spend $2 billion dollars a year to help people who can’t afford rent. Again, on the face of it, it sounds like a really important thing to do. But when there is $2 billion dollars a year injected into the demand-side of the rental market, we get higher rents. Another way to approach this would be to use the $2 billion per year to build non-market housing.

    It almost seems like the two-party systems we find around the world are designed to make the rich richer, while one of them is designed to make it hurt slightly less while they still facilitate it. This creates the perpetual cycle of voting against one party instead of voting for the one we most align with. This is why the people in power do everything they can to prevent single-transferable voting (STV) or ranked-choice voting (RCV). We’re lucky to have it in local elections.

    For parliamentary elections at least we have MMP. So, there’s that.













  • InfraKiwi aims to own and operate key infrastructure assets in New Zealand for the long term. It is anticipated that it will initially be seeded with private equity investment from the Simplicity KiwiSaver and Investment Fund schemes, with the intention to list on the NZX once it achieves critical mass.

    It sounds more like they will “own” the resources, not just do contracts. I’m not very good at 4d-chess but one thing that popped into my mind was the Lake Onslow Project. Then I started thinking about Electricity Generation. So, there might be a world in which things that could be SOEs in the future are owned by a Kiwi business. If InfraKiwi is listed on the NZX, then it could be folded into a “fund” that is available for everyday people to buy using their KiwiSaver.

    This would be quite complimentary to Labour’s new Future Fund, so if Labour win the next election, InfraKiwi could be well positioned to work within that framework and receive government money from “Investment Fund schemes”. Labour said:

    The Fund will invest in New Zealand for the benefit of everyone, building infrastructure and backing innovative businesses to create secure, well-paid jobs and grow wealth in every region.

    InfraKiwi almost seems tailor-made for this. While it would need to be a for-profit company to be listed on NZX, the convenor company “Simplicity” has done some amazing pro-Kiwi things as a not-for-profit which gives me a high-level of trust for their CEO: Sam Stubbs.








  • I don’t see either of the dominant political parties making any meaningful changes to address these issues. The current government acknowledges the issues in their Budget Policy Statement 2025 but then acts in contradiction to their own statements, by disestablishing Callaghan Innovation and gutting CRIs. Their Strategy for AI is basically a “legal thumbs up” with no incentives for businesses to move into this sector.

    Instead of investing in public schools, they are allowing charter school which will make education pay-to-play, which will grow inequality at a time when young people are already locked out of the housing market. All while teachers are walking out in protest over low wages.

    My fear is that when many young people are disenfranchised and aren’t offered a “good deal” to participate in society, then we will get more crime and more drugs.

    Labour isn’t going to fix it and National seems to be actively sabotaging it.

    I just read the book “Abundance” and I can see many of the partisan issues described in the book in the New Zealand context. We’re cooked.