The ceasefire started before Trump took office
Lol. Come on now, don’t be deliberately obtuse.
both effectively mean the same thing when they refer to a ceasefire.
Ok. I don’t know how many times I have to tell Yanks that actions are more important than words.
Well that’s a pretty stupid reason to change your political beliefs.
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
Jean-Paul Sartre
Damn, that is the most vibes based analysis I’ve ever seen. “No they didn’t say it, but I assume they were thinking it.”
Trumps ceasefire is the same as Bidens.
There was no ceasefire under Biden though.
normal (white, western, neoliberal) political spectrum.
“Damn, you’re all still talking about that Hitler guy? That was decades ago!”
As ever, blueMAGA shitlibs care more about what politicians say than what they actually do. Because decorum is more important than the lives of hundreds of thousands of foreigners.
The elections over champ, you can stop screeching the same thing over and over again. Unless you’re already gearing up to lose the next election too.
Oh, so turns out you can deny genocides then? Oh right, only if it’s not the west making the accusation.
Wikipedia is a fairly neutral source.
I mean, it’s basically your bible, your one and only source for everything. Of course you think it’s neutral. It’s not, by the way, but you think it is.
Middle school teachers will tell you that tertiary sources are a good way to start your research when you apparently have no idea what you’re talking about.
That makes sense then, as it’s obvious that neoliberals who only cite Wikipedia have no idea what they’re talking about.
Oh wow, really digging deep for sources now.
Though even these sources basically confirm that it’s a vaguely defended snarl word that can be leveled at anyone to the left of Bernie Sanders.
No they don’t, reasonable criticism of the CPC is fine, they just ban jinogistic “China bad! Tinyman square! Winnie the pooh!” nonsense.
Ok senator McCarthy, not sure what that has to do with what I said. While you’re here, will you also condemn Ukraine’s Donbas genocide?
you seem to be getting hexbear confused with .world
I’m quite left of center myself
lol, every time.
Remember, if the US accuses someone of genocide, you have to believe them! Donbas genocide is just propaganda though, and Gaza isn’t that bad.
I understand, I know that neoliberals have a very hard time recognizing the humanity of anyone outside of their own little bubble.
It’s not propaganda if it comes from the USA!
I have to ask, are shitlibs aware that Wikipedia isn’t divine gospel, and that there are other works in the history of humanity? Because it seems to inevitably be their one and only go to, which is particularly embarrassing given that even a middle school teacher could tell you that it’s not a good source. Even worse, it doesn’t’ even back up your claim!
Really? Seems like you can and did.