Chaphasilor [he/him]
This is madness but it is GLORIOUS madness!
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
6·24 days agoI’m pretty sure it’s an OpenClaw bot, operating autonomously
2·28 days agoWow, they’re not holding back!
And Bandcamp officially supporting OpenSubsonic clients wasn’t on my bingo card for sure!
wait, what kind of redundancy setup do you have? how did you add 20 TB with just a single HDD?
Why would you host it? I just downloaded the zip archive a while ago to have a backup in case the service goes down, but I don’t really know any lrclib integration that supports providing a custom API URL anyway.
14·1 month agoSo that’s gonna be our future. Fighting robots that uncannily get back up with their head dangling on their back.
You should try the beta, if you haven’t yet!
Not a fan of a tag, since it’s not transparent enough. Sounds like every minor use of AI would warrant a tag, which seems past the point.
The disclosure comment I feel works well. People that care about if/how AI was used can check it to get a proper impression of the scale of and workflow for AI usage, and those who don’t care can ignore it.
The dude behind it makes awesome funny shorts on YouTube! But I’m more of a a specialty coffee person myself, so this is definitely not for me.
But I guess it might be a good alternative to crap like Nestle or Starbucks?
1·4 months agoI honestly don’t mind vibe coding too much if there is a significant improvement. But to me at least, this isn’t one.
Okay so they just re-wrote the commit history?
And it seems like the app is just an LLM-powered Liquid Glass UI refresh with some LLM-powered bug fixes. I get that Claude tokens are expensive, so I guess it’s fine to charge money from the people that are happy about these changes. But it also feels a bit discrediting towards the Swiftfin authors…
Did Reefy actually add any serious improvements, or did they just merge existing PRs and then make the app paid?
Why does it matter? It’s a client for a 17 year old console
2·5 months agoDon’t listen to MJ Rathbun here
Actually, the article points out that this is a bubble just like any very disruptive technology in the last 200 years (nothing new). But the focus is on the analysis that a lot of private and public investment is now unknowingly based on the valuations of these AI companies, so if their valuations go down, it could have devastating effects of anything from private investments to public pension.
They are not discovering that this is a bubble, just that it popping is likely to affect us more than most people would think.