Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]

  • 17 Posts
  • 2.68K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 17th, 2022

help-circle








  • I truly don’t get how this is that big a sea change? Why would people be equally as threatened by an Oreshnik than a nuke?

    Because you cant defend against it. Its like why a sword isn’t as scary as a bullet. Sure a sword can take off a limb but you can block it or run away but a bullet will go through most things and you cant outrun it.

    Oreshnik wont replace strategic nukes but it can do what tactical nukes are designed for with none of the radiation or taboo. Strategic nukes are basically props that uphold MAD. Tactical nukes are designed to destroy entire armies with a single strike but they are basically unusable because the difference between using them or Strategic is just a matter of scale. Any use of a tactical nuke sets off the MAD responses the same way strategic nukes would.

    Because Oreshnik is a conventional weapon it can be deployed without anyone saying it is a WMD or a contravention of any treaties. Oreshnik decimated a giant factory. We haven’t seen how serious the damage was but we can theorise what happens when something the weight of a warhead strikes the ground at mach 10. We also have seen how hard the west is working to keep secret how things look after the strike.




  • I’m with you on them not hitting things in poland but I think Putin has to ratchet things up because usa isn’t learning its lessons. It requires more than just another bombing run against the barely existing power system. The oreshnik strike really scared nato for a moment but the moment passed. Russia has to move past trying to use fear and has to use pain to make their message clear.

    They need to do something that doesnt activate nato but also is a material loss for usa. My guess is either a strike against large american assets in ukraine (like the embasy or weapons depot in Lviv) or possibly against an american asset in Syira, Iraq or international waters.