• 7 Posts
  • 1.2K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Are these best shearers not still commoditizing the products of the body of another thinking being?

    What does that have to do with the question of whether or not the process of shearing is violent?

    How do we know your claims of non-violent sheering are true?

    How do you know PETAs claims are true? (“As reported by PETA, one eyewitness to the process said”)

    I’ve been an eyewitness to the process, and I’m not idealogically biased the way PETA extremists are known to be.

    Where is the sheep in this shed, now?

    What? This sentence just doesn’t make sense. The sheep don’t live in the shed.

    The females of the breeds I have observed don’t have horns, and their tails are docked to prevent excrutiatingly painful death by flystrike.

    The alternative to wool production in Australia is cotton, which is even more environmentally destructive than sheep are, mostly due to the sheer amount of water required for cotton production. People need clothes so these industries aren’t going away.

    Shearers have an interest in not causing unecessary harm to sheep, because it is counter productive. That’s my experience.

    The rest of your argument is moralising which I am uninterested in.


  • First I thought the easiest would be ants, though ‘highly’ venomous is debatable they more than make up for it in sheer quantity and ease of raising.

    Which leads us to Myrmecia pyriformis aka the bull ant.

    They attack by biting with powerful jaws, and then sting with their venom repeatedly. They are highly aggressive when their nest is disturbed as many Australian children discover.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myrmecia_pyriformis

    I have been unable to locate information on the LD50 of their venom, as the only study on it seems to be paywalled.

    On second thought it’s probably the Africanized Bee or killer bees, which won’t be as easy to raise safely in my opinion, but are much more dangerous.




  • Seems like he got a reality check right as he was starting to get into the sov cit nonsense.

    The wife is probably in too far at this point and seems like she’s not firing on all cylinders.

    Some of the commentary was a bit harsh, as it’s clear the man has been misled, and unfortunately even some clever people fall into these traps when they’re desperate.

    Really though if the vehicle was registered and she had a valid licence… why the fuck wasn’t she driving?


  • Like I said, people doing self hosting, they often open up ports for those services and management ports.

    Some routers have backdoors built in, such as the Fortinet NGFW backdoor, that can also be exploited.

    I work in this industry and believe me the risk is real, no vpns aren’t a silver bullet, but there are a few good providers out there that can help mitigate some risks of using P2P for more than piracy.



  • If there was a vulnerability it would be exploited in the matter of a few minutes.

    Around 10 minutes for an unpatched XP box with no firewall.

    Much longer for obscure vulnerabilities in routers or more difficult to exploit vulns in hosted software.

    It is also possible for vulnerabilities in peertube itself to exist, which will be an issue regardless of VPN use.


  • I could scan your network for vulnerabilities.

    I could anyway but knowing a target used a service like peertube increases the odds of unpatched hardware or self hosted services in my experience.

    If you’re using an older router you probably have a problem due to unpatched vulnerabilities.

    If you self host you might have a problem, as many package maintainers and developers lag a bit behind security patches.

    A good VPN provider will also block unusual ports.












  • I wonder how intellectual one could call this community

    I get you may be neurodivergant, though I have no idea how/why or to what degree, but what normally happens here is that people ‘read between the lines’. I’m not certain reading between the lines i necessary here because you have been pretty blatant.

    You’re basically saying the community is pretending to be intelligent by latching onto certain media. You also say, very clearly, that the community is incapable or parsing that medias content.

    which mentions an interest in philosophical/political manifestos and sometimes CS Lewis content but suggest they wouldn’t understand the syntax norms in them

    Intentional or not your message is clear; you believe the community are less intelligent than you, aren’t “true” fans of the media, and couldn’t understand that media even if they were fans.

    That could be true, you might be the smartest person in the room, though I have my doubts.

    I have the pleasure of being friends with several individuals who are at least one deviation above myself on the intelligence scale and they communicate differently, but that doesn’t mean your communication style is good, or that people will be receptive to your attitude.