Edamamebean [she/her]

  • 0 Posts
  • 106 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle


  • I liked this one fine, but not enough to understand all the raving people do about it. I enjoyed it, but I definitely don’t consider it a must read, and I probably won’t reread it. I’ve heard people say that they have a hard time finding other books they enjoy as much as Blindsight, and I just don’t exactly understand what stands out about it to so many people. I also was kind of turned off by the evo-psych vibes the narrator gave off when talking to his girlfriend. Idk, I’m not a hard science person and it’s certainly hard sci fi, so maybe there were some aspects of it that flew over my head in that regard.









  • I don’t think that’s true. Cringe comedy certainly punches down sometimes, as many types of comedy do, but to say it is “inherently down punching” seems pretty rediculous to me. There are plenty of examples of cringe comedy where the majority or all of the cringing is being done at bad people, or people who hold power over others. It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia is a good example. That show definitely has problematic aspects, but pretty much 100% of the cringe moments in it are because of awful stuff the awful main cast are doing. Even going back to the Office, which I don’t really like either, I’d argue the majority of cringing that happens is at the expense of Michael, the racist, sexist boss. Obviously both these shows have problematic aspects like most comedy does, and I’m not defending them, but I do think it’s kind of rediculous to say that cringe comedy is inherently reactionary, or that it inherently punches down on marginalized people. I won’t deny many examples of it do, but that’s not because of some inherent flaw in the medium, it’s because we live in a deeply racist, sexist, ableist, homophobic and transphobic society, and our popular media reflects that.





  • 100% agree. The rationalization for school group projects is always “well you’ll have to work together in the workplace” except group projects are not at all the same. In a workplace you are all in the same place at the same time and it’s time dedicated for you all to work on it. Very rarely in a workplace are you required to coordinate all your different coworker’s free time to work on a project together outside work. Group projects are good when you get class time to work on it, like you said. But unfortunately that’s pretty much never because of how condensed academic schedules are.



  • Going to events, hobby meetups, clubs, etc, is always going to be 100x more effective at meeting people than the accursed apps. They have a financial incentive for you to be unsatisfied and keep swiping. Obviously don’t be that person who shows up just to try to pick up people, but seriously you gotta go outside. I understand if maybe you live in a remote area and there aren’t many things going on, but in almost every situation going outside is more effective and less demoralizing than the apps. Especially if you can find something that’s regular and you can attend weekly or monthly or whatever. That’s how connections form naturally, by being in the same place as other people and slowly getting to know them. This thing where we look at some photos of people and then immediately try to talk intimately with them is extremely unnatural, it’s no wonder it doesn’t work very well.