

It’s still “proper bread”, sparky. You clearly know nothing about baking.
It’s still “proper bread”, sparky. You clearly know nothing about baking.
Yes, for tax purposes. It says nothing about the nutritional content.
The bread being considered cake thing isn’t what you think it is. It was a matter of taxation, not nutrition.
Every chemical is potentially risky in sufficient amounts, even water.
It’s not as much of a thing in the US today, but even the European Commission has found that it’s not a problem unless you’re eating 5% of your bodyweight in chlorinated chicken every day. It’s mostly protectionism for European poultry farmers under the guise of safety.
Sources: European Commission. (2003, April). The evaluation of antimicrobial treatments for poultry carcasses.
European Commission. (2008, April). Environmental impact and effect on antimicrobial resistance of four substances used for the removal of microbial surface contamination of poultry carcasses
European Food Safety Authority. (2015). Risks for public health related to the presence of chlorate in food.
I can think of one thing he could do that would get him lots of good press, but it’s typically a TOS violation.
We should start pronouncing it dog-e to annoy the MAGATs
It’s also clear that you’re making things up, sparky.
You’re still a tinfoil hat wearing crackpot, spud.
It is if you want to be taken seriously, sweetie.
It’s not unreasonable to ask someone to elaborate or justify their opinion, kiddo.
Well, it’s Trumphog Day… again.
I didn’t realize it from the spoiler descriptions, but it made total sense when I saw the chapter. Who else but the Alabasta crew would know what an X on your left forearm means?
That was a clever message from Vivi.
The part where it gives random results of varying quality, sparky.
Wrong again, sparky.
Your performative concern for animals is noted.
Cats are obligate carnivores, sparky. That means they can’t be vegan.
Strangely, this may be the one time when the science agrees with them.
European Commission. (2003, April). The evaluation of antimicrobial treatments for poultry carcasses.
European Commission. (2008, April). Environmental impact and effect on antimicrobial resistance of four substances used for the removal of microbial surface contamination of poultry carcasses
European Food Safety Authority. (2015). Risks for public health related to the presence of chlorate in food.