Some aspects that come to my mind:

1. Is the safety of Sigapore exclusively liked to strict drug regulation or aren’t there many other confunding factors which might have an even bigger influence?
2. Given we see this approach as successful and therefore legitime (assuming that in 1 the policy is the main/only driving factor): Would this be applicable to other countries? Singapore is a verry wealthy city state… comparing it to a country like Britain with more area, less population desity and also lower ecomonic performance per area seems missleading. Prosecution becomes more difficult and costly the bigger the area gets I guess.

All-in-all if the approach is sucessful for Singapore: Excellent! Accunsing other countries with different prerequisites of failing on this basis seems to be nonsense as comparing countries and societies in a single aspect while ignoring the gaszillion other factors at play itself is a pointless approach besides populism.

So it was less a problem with the binding and more with fat/flour to prevent them sricking probably? However thanks for the reply. Maybe I should give the substitute a chance outside vegan recipes soon…

This one in particular? About 2 hours (but if a sufficent amount of eaters). I guess if you eat it alone 3 - 4 days as its pretty massive.

Danke, das ist interessant. Ich bin kein Teil dieser Commnity, daher bekomme ich die einzelnen Formen nicht mit sondern nur das was ,draußen" in den Medien auftaucht und das ist eher der Typus ,einsamer Wolf", zumindest soweit ich das wahrnehme.

If you see them condem them. I’m not a judge and neither are you.

Finde die Annahme man könnte in der Apokalypse alleine Überleben wenn man nur gut genug vorbereitet ist eh irrig.

Kooperation schlägt Konkurrenz und eine Gruppe von 20 Leuten wird einen Einzelnen immer überwältigen, egal wie klug er glaubt zu sein. Der beste Schutz besteht in der Krise daher darin starke, solidarische Gemeinschaften zu bilden.

Exzellent, Mohn ist immer gut (außer bei fertigem Mohnback aus der Tüte '^^)! :D

The posts are, in comparisson to the actual content, intentionally misleading.

If you compare titles and actual content of the articels they’re purposely misleading to influence opinion.

/edit: missing word

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

This user posts exclusively pro-Chinese and anti-European content in very high frequency.

You can do a good job all you want… if voters see lies as equally valid argument you can’t win.

(That being said you surely have a point that the current governments don’t usually work in favor of the majority… but that applies even more for right-wing parties bought by even more corrupt elites.)

Das hoffe ich auch…

Danke dir für den netten Austausch!