Honestly, I’ve been hearing this a lot of reddit and it feels like Russian disinformation to get liberals/Democrats to throw their own stupid Jan 6.

Post some reliable evidence, and an actual reason why Democrats aren’t talking about this reliable information and I may be convinced. Democrats and Kamala would be the people to champion this information if it were valid since they lost power due to the “cheating”. The fact that they haven’t said anything tells me it’s probably not real.

Impeachment doesn’t require the DOJ. We would Just need the house to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate. Regardless the house is mainly controlled by Rs so I doubt they would impeach, and the Senate is also Republican controlled meaning Trump wouldn’t even be removed if he was impeached

Saying we can do better than trump/fascism is not what the OP is implying. The op is implying what were are doing now is the same as what we have done before. We can acknowledge that we’ve done bad before, but now it’s for sure way worse. I agree with Bernie that now is way worse than before

Idk, that would make sense except that desantis had been talking them down as well. If desantis were more neutral about the situation I would be more inclined to believe your theory.

Are you literally implying Trump and Biden are handling the presidency the exact same way? That the Dems have been passing similar laws to the Republicans? If so, you’re either ingorant, or a shill.

I don’t get how this relates to my post… Could you reword your comment

How did he “demand a second term in the last minute”? The assumption is a president will run for re election.

For real. The issues occurring in the US are various, but the vast spreading of disinformation in the US is crippling. Don’t let unchecked lobbying (aka bribing of politicians) occur in your country, don’t let “news organizations” spread false realities.

I’ve not been diagnosed, but I experience this all the time. I’ve made a habit of saying past me is so smart, if I remembered. I’ve written notes that I have forgotten about, and found afterwards and thought, wow if I had remembered this note, it would have been very helpful. Also examples like your said, “where’s [blank]?” Search for it find it after way too long* " oh wow that was an extremely logical place to have put it, if only I remembered. GJ past me"

I’m legitimately confused as to what will happen here. Seemingly, Trump is the one that got them out of Romania, yet Trump’s allies are attacking them. You would expect Trump to ensure his team is consistent with whether this are “bad people” or not.

I’m hoping they still get tried for any crimes they committed.

I feel you’re also ignoring the huge amount of free publicity that Trump go from TikTok, Instagram and X. Kamala, or any D, would not have gotten that extra power.

I mean he was asked to step down because of the worry that his mental faculties, not due to his policies. Remember, it was right after his first debate with Trump. The following debate, Kamala roasted Trump.

Found in on my desktop as it wasn’t on jerboa. Thank you!

What were the autistic stereotypes? I honestly just saw him mimicking Elon

Could you give an example of what youre talking about?

I feel your conflating things with your first point. Yeah a person living in NY is going to make more money than the average american (as you point out with that data you posted), but that doesn’t mean you can’t be poor as in struggling to pay bills, to save for retirement, or to pay for living expenses. By your definition, there’s no poor people in the US, because compared the to world our poor people are very wealthy. My point is, the financially struggling people in New York are more likely to take public transit than the people that are wealthy in New York. Emphasis on more likely because you assumed i meant all lower income people only take public transit (the confusion maybe stemming from my private jet analogy).

You’re right about large cities will have large populations, but that doesn’t mean that cities want everybody concentrating in certain areas. Providing incentives or disincentives so manage movement is helpful, especially when you have solid alternatives in the form of public transit. The fees aren’t crazy high, and it encourage cost efficient decision making (in terms of better for the city as vehicles are extremely detrimental).

I would definitely support higher corporate tax rates. A big issue is that congestion pricing is already something a majority of voters are liking and is being implemented. Increased taxes can still be done later.

I’m in jerboa, I don’t see this seeing. Is this something I should just do on a PC?

Congestion pricing is a tax levied against the poor? The poor are less likely to be driving wtf. That’s like saying extra taxes on private jets is a tax for preventing the poor from getting private jets: that wasn’t not an issue and is in fact a way of redistributing wealth to lower classes. You don’t need to drive to Manhattan to experience Manhattan in the same way that you don’t need to own a private jet to travel.

If you have a better way to reduce congestion in Manhattan AND provide additional funds to public transit, feel free to suggest that idea.

Cost is very important. In terms of schools, i think state schools are pretty alright. If you get into a very famous school, i think it really sticks out as above average but so does the cost. I think both canadian universities and CA state schools will be viewed about the same so its up to you whether the cost is worth it.

Thank you so much! I’m excited to try this out!