Huldra [they/them, it/its]

  • 6 Posts
  • 634 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 7th, 2020

help-circle






  • I’ve essentially never seen anything from the sphere of “parapolitics” that actually appears to impart any useful practical knowledge for understanding the past or predicting the future, at best it appears to be a masturbatory hobby that lets you be smug about JFK for 50+ years straight, at worst it makes you some annoying asshole who goes around saying shit like “denying the existence of snuff films is leftist flat earth” for attention.

    Also Programmed To Kill is a very stupid book.




  • Yes, most critically he later admitted in an article(after being laid off) that he was personally witness to Helen Hindpere receiving verbal abuse on a company call that was so loud that he could hear it from her headphones.

    Helen mentions this in the documentary, Tuulik did not, and while he was not the primary figure questioning Hindperes work and leadership, he took a centrist stance between owners and the fired creatives.

    Obviously not that any of this makes him deserve being subjected to the crap thats going on, though I do think it makes the goofy radical shit from his studio take on kind of a hollow tone.

    If you’re gonna be the gamer maoist studio dropping manifestos with “creatives hold up half the sky” type slogans, I think a gamer self crit is warranted too.



  • I think a big part is that if you accept for arguments sake the fundamental legal premises and rules of a court trial in the Rittenhouse case, you can arrive at a conclusion that within that premise and those laws the acquittal makes sense. Basically that the injustice is enshrined in the bones of the system rather than a malicious and arbitrary dismissal of what’s supposed to happen.

    Meanwhile there just is not a reasonable argument that a trained soldier would not be aware that extended application of a chokehold past unconsciousness would certainly be lethal, and that he continued past the point where average bystanders could tell that he was murdering Jordan Neely.

    Theres no legal argument that makes sense in this scenario, anyone who accepts it are accepting it outside of the law.

    Support for Daniel Penny is all but overtly just simple support for lynching, while Rittenhouse you can very torturously make a case involving other American brainworms like the right to self defense and the idea that a dumb fascist toddler like Rittenhouse earnestly feared for his life.