Actually when you discuse the 187th century. You are talking about pre revisionist science. IE before the definition of the scientific method.

And all the articles you shared were dated 1990s to late 2010s so no you were in no way talking about past views. But instead questioning hypothesis and reviews that has so far failed to form scientific theories on the subject.

Most age groups find a days work stressful.

Young people are just the first generation to be unashamed to admit it.

In part because we grew up with to many rancid arse holes like Liz Kendal expressing her toxic crap.

Nearly all of these present hypotheses. As of this moment there is no clearly accepted theoretical model on how animals or human consciousness works. Just lots of open to debate hypotheses. Because for all we understand about neurons and processing of the mind. Much of the hypotheses are not truly testable. Just collections of experiments and ideas the scientific community is unable to form clear understanding and agreement on.

If you read this collection and say science believes animals feel no pain you are either misinformed or lieing. These are just a collection of opinions and experiments that fail to form clear conclusions as of yet. Because the simple fact is the mind is still very unknown for both humans and animals.

You sent articles that propose an hypothesis not a tested theory. Hence they are just some scientists proposing as of yet unfounded ideas. They are not valid theories until both tested and reviewed by independent groups.

Hence my who,e point that modern media likes to misrepresent science.

Nope the fact is FPTP is mathematically garrenteed to force a 2 party system. As 3rd parties will always split the vote forcing control to the more unified but smaller opposition.

The political direction of other nations. Honestly it is what all wealthy nations use aid for.

Welcome to FPTP

About 12% of the same light via older methods.

But you are correct. Old signs rarely used light as the cost was rarely worth it. Now running lights 24/7 that would not be used at. All before. Is an increase in overall use.

Add how much more controllable ot is then past methods. Lighting up a sign on a bus in the 1980s was fairly useless. The viewability would be lower. But with LEDs it is practicle. Dospite the fact that bis is useing more diesel (most buses are still diesel) to travel that same distance as it did before the signage.

Its hardly suprising when cost is the only motivation used.

But unfortunatly few pitential customers are going to refuse the company because there advertising is not considering overall power use.

Ask any vet about that and honestly nope that is not what science thinks. But some scientists do propose other explanations for events that how science works.

Technically you don’t feel pain. Your body sends signals to your brain and muscles. Your muscles react to those signals. And your brain interprets them in a way that results in you changing actions. IE your mind creates pain you don’t feel it.

The destination seems non existant in the mind of yourself with your hand on a hotplate. But it is a scientifically accurate one. One that must be considered when considering how pain killerssuch as opiates work.

And it is this gap in human vs scientific language that media loves to sell articles on.

Team the medias indicators that science has just discovered it. Is crap. Its more science has just proved or documented something ot has suspected for a long while.

Anyone with a dog knows they have such ideas and thoughts. But recognising it via anecdotal evidence and actually proving it in a way that stands up to challenge are 2 very different things.

Unfortunately modern media really dose not benifit fro pointing that out.

Musk and team (including his possible puppet trump)

Are fully expecting this. 2016 to 2020 was an eye opener for the wealthy who wanted control. They saw an incompetent trump support group not suffer due to slow or non response from the 3 branch system.

So they got competent arseholes to back him and plan to win this civil war before the rest od the US even recognises it as a civil war.

All the US checks and balances are non existant when the curruption uses it to slow down opposition.

Honestly consumers are not told. We are encouraged and the price of energy is the greatest encouragement.

Advertisers have the same encouragement. But their motivation is based on how effective the advertising is to the company.

Its not like anyone is arrested for not reducing use.

Trump places billionaire in charge of cutting spending and signs orders to do so.

Congress points out he is not authorised to do that without their support.

Billionaire starts shutting employees out of PC and announces the departments are broken beyond repair as he forcibly shuts them down.

Err sooner the US relises they are in a civil war the sooner you can stop this. Trump etc seems to be, intentionally trying to shut down the ability for the 3 branches to function against him. He is also moving supporters into military roles.

Jan 6th was nothing.

At the time of writing. How many partitions have had the support of a significant % of society compared to electoral wins.

Because that will always be the argument used when trying to use a partition to change the views of an elected government. Even when those views are not manifesto bound.

So yep the numbers placed to force response and debate are pointless. They are as others indicate, just about making people think they have a voice. But more importantly is is about allowing the government to say only 100000 disagree with us. Where as 16m voted to leave the EU. So we have the right to ignore this debate.

Lets face it is 100k could change the view of a government elected by 30% of voters. It would hardly be democratic. These things need to start out looking for the support needed to scare a government into change. Support needs to be built with the population before trying to express that support in such ways. Or at least during that time.

We need to ignore the numbers provided by the government. Amd instead look to numbers,bers we can beat them over the head with in the media.

You can apply lube.

And with under 16m signatures. That debate will result in a no. Unfortunaly no government is going to do this with out evidence of a clear majority of support.

A very huge fan base of Jeremy Clarkson can argue that he should not be called a cunt. So yeah that would fail.

Not even sure the most supportive brexiter would say the same of farage. You only have to look at his smile. And you feel the urge to throw milkshake at it. So yeah.

Its only a defence. If she has no history of diagnosable attacks.

I am no expert on epilepsy . But know young diagnosis is far from exclusive. So it is entirly possible this was her first attack. Or even the first attack she recognised as such. (IE not happening when she was asleep or otherwise unable to identify).

But if she has ever had an event she should suspect makes her unfit to drive. She is required to tell the DVLA and not drive.

But that recognition requirement is hard to define. Drivers are not expected to be medical experts. So in general unless a doc has told her. It would be hard to proove she is aware of any risk.

T1d myself. Diagnosed long before I was able to drive. I now do not drive because my condition is not safe to do so. But was in the situation for almost 30 years. Where I was required to testify my stability to drive every few years. And could be held responsible if I did so falsely.

No. At no point is lackmof evidence proving someone innocent ever acceptable to debate at a trail.

And I the lead up to the trail. It is not something even the defence or prosecution is likely to consider. As neither is able to consider it as argument. Or make decisions on taking the case based on such.

Tory MPs need to revese there rectal cranium insersion. And recognise ethics is not a subject, they have any fucking right to raise atm.