If you think you’re on “the right” and are not advocating actively and persistently for Trump’s removal from office, you’re a fucking useless moron.

Term limits were a compromise for the olds.

We need to stop compromising with old people, and start hurting their feelings until they resign.

Age limits hurt boomer feelings, and that’s a good thing.

Wow, you managed to lose me in the first 12 words even though I think I vehemently agree with your politics and your point.

I think you can do better than this empty posturing.

not everything he says is indicative of what he does.

That’s stupid!

You haven’t actually been paying attention. Every single time he says something, he’s tried to do it.

The declaration of the possibility of the use of military force in Panama has to be taken at face value. Don’t be a fucking moron.

Your theory of attention management is stupid and bad.

That’s so fucking stupid! They’re covering it because it’s news!

All media/journalism is struggling to make ends meet and no one in (real) media wants Trump to be in power. This cynical theory of the media is fucking stupid.

This is the bad thinking that must be extirpated at the root.

Shut the fuck up. You fucking moron. What happened the last time he was president? He tried to assassinate foreign leaders and was stopped by Mattis. He summoned his militia to the capitol and mounted an insurrection.

He’s only a troll to you because that makes you feel better.

Stop it. Stop spreading your stupid ignorance.

But the denialism in OP needs to stop too and it has to be appropriate to call it STUPID. You can’t ignore the malignancy when it’s in the presidency and hope it will go away. Every single thing Trump says is serious and literal until someone in his administration stops him.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Sometimes it even meets that aspiration!

Talking about the patriarchy is feminism. Feminism necessarily centers women, or it’s not really feminism, degraded into an all-encompassing ideology devoid of its intended purpose.

(PETA isn’t feminism just because it can invoke the language of oppression.)

So yes, I advance this notion that talking about the patriarchy in a topic about male pain is centering feminism and therefore centering women. I don’t see that this should be controversial.

Except, of course, to those who universalize feminism into a cure-all ideology, which is shorthand for broken thinking which diverts feminism from its purpose.

You can’t fix men with feminism: that’s an incoherent idea.

Why shouldn’t feminist ideas center women?

I’m not saying that patriarchy centers women, I’m saying its invocation here centers feminism in a topic about a masculine issue, which is to, say, it’s rude and counterproductive.

Removed by mod

You are correct that I was speaking glibly and that when I said “shitty woman” I could have said “a woman who happened to be acting shitty.”

But people are listening to me.

You haven’t addressed anything the other person has said.

So?

My point is about the nature of their statement and how it centers women in a topic that is about how when men speak about feelings women center a feminine perspective.

Just because you’re not listening doesn’t mean others aren’t.

Removed by mod