JuneFall [none/use name]

  • 16 Posts
  • 361 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2020

help-circle

  • Funny but incorrect quip. The German imperial project ended in the genocide against Ovaherero and Nama, with the aim to exterminate them completely. The Jewish genocide in the “Occupied Territories” is aimed not at physical extermination of all the people in Gaza. In any case the actions and deeds really don’t have to be compared in terms of “significance” (as moralistic judging term). They can and ought to be understood in themselves and the similarities in practices can be looked at. Equating the actions of Israel and Nazi Germany is diminishing the holocaust. You can critique the state without doing that.

    The material base and the white supremacist super structure in terms of the German or South African project are much different to the Israeli one if you look at before 1945, or between then and the 1973 war. However I would wish for as principled stances against the USA and that is sorely lacking.


  • Marx famously was known for not being pedantic about use of terms and phrases.

    Israel can’t have Hitlerism, though Fascist thoughts and elements of Ethnonationalist support are not a rare thing. Being more or less clear with terms matters as it is a necessary differentiating element for material conditions and intersectional pressures that happen. Antifascism that we do for decades also means to not equate Nazism with things that aren’t Nazism.

    It is a problem when Israel and Nazi Germany are equated. It is also antisemitic and this community tries to be both (un)critically supportive of liberation fights (by less than progressive forces instead of only ideal Marxists) in Palestine and the Levant and not to ignore antisemitism.

    I do really did the outdated voice recording of Lenin in regards to Anti Jewish pogroms. Lenin’s real voice reading the speech












  • First of thanks for your extensive response. I do applaud you for trying to figure out why you are an other opinion than a felt majority here. Will read it in a bit completely.

    As a cop in a police union, your job is to enforce the law level-handedly, not to decide what the law should be.

    I would argue that is not the job of the police. Philosophy Tube’s Abigail Thorne did a video “How the police makes the law” about something to related to that.

    The idea you write is somewhat of a liberal one that assigns values to the “state of law” that is a good deal class warfare by the bourgeosie against the working class and marginalized sub strata. If you mean that in a Socialist state the police would act in accordance with law, you wouldn’t be quite wrong, but some transitory aspects would remain. However the law would be somewhat different in that it then used as a tool in the class warfare against capitalists. How many people responsible for the financial crisis were harrased by the police or jailed? How many - if you see China is socialist - were jailed there?
    I guess that could be somewhat what you mean with governmental position?

    From what I can tell, that isn’t really the case in Vancouver because of the extremely large immigrant minority population in the city and the relatively robust system of police oversight in the OPCC.

    I would argue is not quite as good as you think it is, while it is an liberal improvement to the status quo. My question would be do you have contact to affected and what do they and experts in the regard, as well as Marxists in your region say about the police?

    but I do think police unions should be evaluated from their role of protecting workers’ rights and maintaining worker integrity rather

    Which they don’t. However I do agree that evaluation of Vancouver police unions should be done twofold, analytical due to their position, structure and function in the class warfare and general police critique and also in its specificity in regards to Vancouver.

    There are a couple of theoretical texts and articles that would apply