It’s not actually a buyout. It’s a promise to pay them exactly how much they would make to work for 6 more months and then quit. But they can’t quit before then. Also they need to let them know by next week. Also also, there will be no additional severance pay.
Deepseek R1 actually tells you why it’s giving you the output it’s giving you. It brackets it’s “thoughts” and outputs those before it gives you the actual output. It straight up tells you that it believes it is immoral or illegal to discuss the topic that is being censored.
So here’s my take on the whole stolen training data thing. If that is true, then open AI should have literally zero issues building a new model off of the full output of the old model. Just like deepseek did. But even better because they run it in house. If this is such a crisis, then they should do it themselves just like China did. In theory, and I don’t personally think this makes a ton of sense, if training an LLM on the output of another LLM results in a more power efficient and lower hardware requirement, and overall better LLM, then why aren’t they doing that with their own LLMs to begin with?.
One regular fries is $8 at my local five guys. Just fries. $11 if I want a regular drink with that. That’s more than I want to pay for a burger combo and it doesn’t even have a burger with it.
Living up to your name… Could only be more accurate if you were TechJesusCultist. Everyone involved here are socially inept, self absorbed, wannabe journalists and not a single party here have a good track record for ethical journalism historically. Anyone here for journalistic integrity is barking up the wrong tree. They should both shut the fuck up and go back to making their money and getting free tech products for the reviews they put out and stop with this YouTube drama bullshit.
I know this is said mostly in jest but the implications of being deported to a country you aren’t a citizen of is terrifying. Being stateless is often a terrible punishment. It means you aren’t welcome anywhere in the world.
There is not much we can do about it at this point. The citizens have made their choice. And the ones that made the choice are the ones with the most guns.
Yes, you are trying to be pedantic by pointing out that account boosting is not cheating. But it is cheating so not only are you being pedantic, you are wrong .
It is cheating. I’m not sure what this weird take is. He used means that are against the rules of play to become statistically better than other players and rise in the ranks. Boosting and account sharing are against the rules. it is cheating.
My grandfather died right around the release of psychonauts 2. I played that game nearly non-stop while I did a 100% completion. It got me through the start of that grieving period. I remember being mad it wasn’t longer because nothing else released at the time was nearly that good when it came to writing and gameplay. Amazing game to be honest. Definitely in my top 10 all time. But I might be biased because of it being exactly what I needed when I needed it.
1011000 is binary for 88
You must really love the taste of Elon’s dick in your mouth…
African-American usually refers to descendants of America’s black slave trade. They are not Africans who moved to America. We don’t call dutch born American emigrants Dutch-American. We call them Dutch. We don’t call Chinese born American emigrants Chinese-American. We call them Chinese. Their nationality or continental heritage is usually how they are referred to. Calling Musk an African-American is by a long way, more racist than calling him unamerican.
So I learned a physics lesson on a forklift. I backed up beside a pallet on the ground and looked back there to line myself up. What I didn’t see was the wooden 2x4 hanging off of the pallet directly in the path of the forklift driving in reverse. So I ran over the board and loony tunes style, the board flew up through the cabin smacking me dead on the side of the face.
Honestly I think it’s a terrible precedent to set. Now the government can just say they don’t like XYZ website and are banning it. That wasn’t really something they did 10 years ago. Unless of course it was illegal activity. But I don’t think this is a net win for the internet. Regardless of what decision has been made, freedoms were removed and citizens’ rights were sidestepped for political means. I think it shouldn’t be the government’s job to protect us from ourselves.
I was totally onboard with banning tiktok on government computers and I was completely on board with the government publicly expressing concerns over the motives of tiktok as a business. That’s where I personally believe this should have stopped. Inform the people of the danger and then let them decide what to do with that information.
The problem with that idea though, is that nation-wide, citizens’ trust in the government is at an all-time low. So even if the government said tiktok is bad and you shouldn’t use it, people already don’t trust the government. Maybe they should work on regaining the trust their people had for them 65 years ago before it tries to get people to behave how they think we should.
I grew up in California. I can tell you it’s a very big place with lots of different types of folks. Most of the state geographically is conservative. Even a few of the largest cities in the state vote Red. LA is just that densely populated.
The users and posts in instance B are invisible to users in instance A. Regardless of if the messages are in instance C
Even worse is the electoral college distribution among those populations. And the winner-take-all nature of our presidential elections
It’s pretty obvious what people mean when they are referring to the states. When referring to states that are not the United States of America, we usually use the word country. Context provided indicates we are specifically talking about the USA in this post. Thank you for playing the smart ass game
I agree. Sex work should not be slandered by comparing this idiot to a sex worker.