![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
That doesn’t counter the claim you replied to in any way.
That doesn’t counter the claim you replied to in any way.
If it’s a negotiation, not a trade war, then how is this not just them giving a counter-offer?
“If you can’t beat 'em, make 'em join you”
The one that bought the country
Don’t support nazis or the people that support nazis.
We need more information - what are the prompts you’re giving it? You’ll also probably have to give context with API docs
If you haven’t played with LLMs much, the best advice I can give you is to be more verbose. Seriously, write something like TEN times more than you think you need.
At this point in time, yes there is a 0% chance that AI will get this right consistently. Depending on your model and prompt, I’m sure you’ll get it occasionally - maybe even often - but for this to be automatic you’d need to be looking at like 95+%
We agree on the argument you shifted to - they barely delivered the game they promised on day 1. But that wasn’t what your first comment said. You said the game was starting to almost approach what they promised before launch.
You just can’t get the connection to me referencing “launch” in the first joke and then focusing entirely on the argument instead of a joke. Wild. You’ll do great in debate class when you’re old enough 🙄
Do those missing features means the game isn’t at it’s promised state?
Literally yes. You can shift the goalposts all you want, that doesn’t remove the fraud.
You can claim you know my brain better all you want, that doesn’t change my core argument for the entirety of this conversation: the game never reached launch promises, evem after 5 years. Sean Murray is a fraudster and doesn’t deserve control of any company.
Obviously shitty, but you seem to understand that and are working to stop. Nobody was permanently or seriously harmed, and you’re working on making reparations to the person that you harmed the most, even if they don’t know it.
Sounds like you were a shitty kid that didn’t know better, and that you’ve gained some forethought. Sucks that it mostly came from fear of consequences for yourself instead of empathy to others, but it also seems like you’re on the right path.
It’s okay to grow and to learn how to be a better person. Keep going. Seconding the other commenter that suggested therapy - even if not directly about this.
Who’s moving goalposts, now? 😂🤣😂🤣
It’s almost as if you realized you were wrong and decided to change the subject. Wild.
I lived in Milwaukee for three years and literally never heard of Real Chili 😅
That just means they can’t get good Mexican food, but you can get good tex mex anywhere 🤷♂️ it won’t be peak, no, but it’ll be good
That said, their CEO is out there talking about their new game exactly like he did with No Man’s Sky, making very bold claims. We’ll see how that turns out for them. lol
It’s almost as if rewarding fraud instead of punishing it tells them it’s OK 🤷♂️ crazy how that works
So you linked a spreadsheet that shows I’m correct, and use that to claim that I changed the subject and am shifting goalposts…
If both of my claims are objectively true - based on the source that YOU provided - then did I change the subject or was I just adding additional context? It sure seems more like you’re avoiding the subject and attacking a strawman instead of the arguments I made.
I’m in the minority that doesn’t support fraud 🤷♂️ I don’t care how much time and effort they put into the game after stealing millions of dollars
So, try and follow me here… if the game still doesnt have features promised at launch, then did it have those features on day 1?
My complaint is the fraud, and always has been. Joking about how it still doesnt meet launch expectations is literally the same thing.
How are my two complaints in any way different?
And a willingness to lie out your ass and fraudulently market for years
If you can’t source a dataset, then you shouldn’t be researching AI. It’s the first and single most important step of the entire process.