Many licences have different rules for redistribution, which I think is fair. The site is free to use but it’s not fair to copy all the data and make a competitive site.

Of course wikipedia could make such a license. I don’t think they have though.

How is the lack of infrastructure an argument for allowing something morally incorrect? We can take that argument to absurdum by saying there are more people with guns than there are cops - therefore killing must be morally correct.

Sp’Flayed?

Rookie numbers. France alone has over 40000, according to this: https://www.discovercars.com/blog/roundabouts

Hve you heard of GDPR? USB-C mandate? Right to repair?

There are plenty faces if you look for them!

Or just “Name”. Not all people have a clear first and last name.

Interesting idea but they are comparing different year surveys with the same age children.

Do you think that kids are more prone to lying now, than earlier years?

It may also be cheaper because they only run (and acal) when needed, instead of having a few extra servers running “just in case”.

Pronoun law in Canada, probably https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained

Just the mods

Interesting. I’ve never made that distinction between reinforcement and punishment.

Positive reinforcement is the act of adding either a reward for good behavour or a punishment for bad behavior.

It seems like both of you are doing that.

Yes they are telling you tomorrow.

Some derivatives aim to lower the risk, so the active decision to buy it would be to ungamble then? Or is it just gambling wyen you choose not to buy it?

Do you have insurance on your house or do you gamble that it will be fine without it?

Exactly! Which is why it is mad trying to outlaw or frown upon “gambling” with stocks.

There are many great wxamples in this thread already of why derivatives are necessary to a functioning society.

They don’t, as others have pointed out. It’s just a standard single board computer with some addons and a case.

I disagree. That’s like saying insurance shouldn’t be allowed.

Highly regulated would be anotheratter though.

I think you have a very specific definition of gambling which I don’t share. To me, gambling is much broader. Wikipedia summarizes it well:

“Gambling thus requires three elements to be present: consideration (an amount wagered), risk (chance), and a prize.”

That’s it. It doesn’t make an opinion whether the bet is fair. There doesn’t have to be a casino involved at all. It also doesn’t require you to put “most or your life savings” into it for it to be gambling.

I think you are conflating high risk, high stakes and even the precence of a casino into the same concept and call it gambling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling

That doesn’t make sense at all. How would you - given two stacks of papers - know which stack the correct form is?

One of the most prestigious purpose a computer can have!