At this point, I’m not sure the hostages provide any leverage to the Palestinians so they probably don’t see much other than upside for returning them. They know the assault will continue but how there won’t be any “save the hostages” reasoning behind it, which are what the (liberal) Zionist anti-war protestors have had as their only condition to opposition to the slaughter.
Maxwell Tiny House was right there and they missed it
Don’t blame me…
Conan is rolling in his grave
Get a new bit. This one sucks.
This is a waste of time until they develop a better hull for moon-fairing ships. Everyone knows the moon’s prospects are primarily tied to its bountiful whaling fisheries.
It’s a great way to turn her against Jesus when he doesn’t return from this work trip.
Objectively one of Trump’s least-inspired nicknames. Maybe he really did just have a stroke.
Wasn’t Stalin’s cousin from there?
Because of the words he slipped into underage girls’ DMs
and you lied multiple times
Also false. “Disengage” has to be stand-alone, not at the end of a rant full of your own false statement. So here, you can disengage as you smoke this 
Zohran and his backpedalling (and it is perceived as backpedalling, thats what matters in political campaigns) on radical rhetoric that he has himself used in the past
This is incorrect and it is the second time you have said it in this thread after being presented evidence that it is incorrect. It is consistent with what he said months ago and it is not “rhetoric that he has himself used in the past” as the article I pasted above clearly says.
So, yes, you are shit stirring by trying to create a need for all this conflict in this thread based on false premises that you then double down on and get all defensive about. How are we supposed to have a “healthy discussion” based on your false premise?
The media was going to keep asking him this question no matter what his answer was. The campaign against him is explicitly Zionist and running on those terms alone. All it shows is that ZM’s campaign has developed an internal messaging about this and he has been completely consistent with it for months. I don’t think it is “suppressing” posts of his statements to not post the same thing over and over again every couple of weeks to get 70 comments riled up about something that provides no new information and has been thoroughly tread. It just seems more like shit stirring (see the rest of the comments on this post acting like he actually changed positions), which is definitely not helpful.
This article is from 2 months ago. What is different between today’s and what this says? Is there any new information? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/16/zohran-mamdani-israel-gaza-intifada
No way. He said the same thing he said two months ago about a slogan he doesn’t personally use??? It’s all over. Wrap it up everyone.
“Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I [sit idly by].”
Honestly hilarious reaction by Zohran