MultigrainCerealista [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 0 Posts
  • 89 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 28th, 2023

help-circle
















  • Yeah people were “psyched” about it but when they stopped being psyched and stopped watching - when they lost the tv ratings - the Apolo mission was canned.

    How is what you said even vaguely a rebuttal of the idea it was showy propaganda with minimal scientific value?

    Playing golf on the moon actually wasn’t an important thing to do. It’s cool, I’d like to do it… but it’s really pretty superficial. It’s a vanity propaganda piece and nothing else that’s why we didn’t go back because it doesn’t matter.


  • Why?

    Why even is getting a man on the moon important?

    And if it was important why did we stop?

    The value of manned missions was propaganda which is why the Apolo mission was cancelled when it stopped getting TV ratings. Because getting humans on the moon didn’t actually deliver anything of much importance except those TV ratings.

    “First game of golf on the moon” good job USA you did it meanwhile the USSR landed on Venus.



  • I think it’s strident individualism masquerading as anarchism.

    Both anarchism and socialism heavily center community. They put slightly different emphasis on different parts of community and anarchism is more decentralized but anarchism still places community and a persons place and rights vis a vis their community as well as the expectations a community can have of its members at the center.

    It’s less obvious with anarchism since anarchism is less proscriptive about what form community should take and usually it’s some vision of a decentralized variety of voluntarist communes or something like that, but it always has the idea of a person as a part of their community at the center.

    Strident individualism, the idea that the individual is more important than the collective, is antithetical to both anarchism and socialism and this is what really separates right-libertarianism from anarchism.