Genocide is a pretext: only in 2025 Germany.

In terms of how close American society was to fascism it’s actually worse, so congrats on doing negative work I guess.

Okay I disagree with the content, but good meme.

There isn’t one, that’s the whole point. You’ll need to actually resist fascism if you want to stop fascism.

No, I’m implying that A: They’re not going to release the unredacted files, among other things because diddling kids is bipartisan and B: Even if they do, the Epstein files are not an anti-fascist silver bullet. MAGA won’t abandon Trump as long as a single brown person is still alive in America.

Uh… Isn’'t the goal to stop fascism?

The UN just officially declared palestine a genocide

The UN body able to do that is the ICJ, and so far they haven’t done so. UN commissions and experts =/= the UN. Not that it makes “neutrality” in the face of genocide any less horrible, but the finding in the OP isn’t much different from past UN experts saying it’s a genocide.

The UN was created to avoid war between major powers, genocide is within its purview but not really something it’s built to handle.

Lemmy when Mamdani starts successfully pushing the Democrats left: “I am suddenly motivated to spend a lot of energy whining about how bad the Democrats are”

I don’t remember a time when Lemmy wasn’t (rightly) complaining about how bad the Democrats are. This is confirmation bias at work.

What is there to talk about, though? On a platform as left-leaning as Lemmy, “Mamdani’s policies will be good for NYC” is a no-brainer.

I mean usually yes, but in the history in question here is public and very easy to confirm.

It progresses logistically; eventually it’ll plateau and there’s no reason to believe that plateau will come after “can do everything a human can.”. See: https://www.promptlayer.com/research-papers/have-llms-hit-their-limit

If I’m not wrong that was the whole point of criminalizing weed.

Yes, but that’s not what’s being mocked in the OP, which doesn’t at all reference the fact that Toilet Paper USA is fascist. The action being mocked isn’t at all problematic, even if the people taking that action are, is my point.

You seem to have exactly zero idea what you’re talking about.

I hate these fuckers, but there’s nothing problematic here if we ignore the fascism part.

Hint: Marxist-Leninists really like slavery, so that’s not a distinguishing factor.

Oh I should’ve said chattel slavery, but still abolitionism older than you imply. In any case, however, it was very much a thing by the time of the founding of the US and a few states had banned slavery even before the American war of independence. Even if we ignore the whole “not giving them their freedom despite the will of his father in law explicitly demanding it” part, someone like Washington could not have been ignorant of abolitionist thought except willingly.

Latest addition to my list of horrible blasphemy that should not exist.

1/4 of Presidents lived in a time and society where owning slaves was accepted.

Abolitionism is as old as (edit: chattel) slavery itself. They owned those slaves and inflicted unspeakable horrors on them despite no shortage of people telling them that’s wrong; it’s not like “black people are people too” was such a foreign thought to them.