If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying.

  • 13 Posts
  • 2K Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2024

help-circle
  • Full BlueAnon territory here. Incredible the mental gymnastics y’all will go through to reaffirm your loyalty to the state and hatred of the state’s enemies, even when it’s blatantly acting against you.

    It can’t be that the world is a complex place filled with many different factions each pursuing different interests. No, everyone is either with us or against us, and everyone who’s against us is secretly controlled by Putin. Trump? Putin puppet. Hamas? Putin puppet. Me, and anyone else who challenges your ideas? Putin puppet, I’m sure. The world is no more complex than a Saturday morning cartoon with one big bad pulling all the strings. There’s no need to ever study anything, let along actually try to see things from other perspectives (the very idea borders on treason!).

    Let’s assume that your conspiracy theory is correct. Why then, is Putin’s puppet Trump committed to fighting Putin’s puppet Hamas? It’s a blatant contradiction, but it doesn’t matter, because it’s not about making any sense. It’s nowhere close to being a serious analysis.

    Every country in the world has it’s own culture and history and narratives and internal factions and motivations, but all of that has to be mashed down into good guys and bad guys within the scope of modern American politics. You would do far better to step back from the news and read an actual book.











  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldWelcome ex-Redditors!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The f-slur is defined as referring to gay men, but people also use it to insult straight men by suggesting that they’re gay. In the same way, “tankie” may be defined as a particular type of communist, but it is deployed against people who don’t fit the definition to imply that they do.

    This is how basically all insults work, don’t play dumb. The definition is something assumed to be bad, and the way it’s used is to suggest the person meets that definition.



  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldWelcome ex-Redditors!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago
    Glad you asked, more than happy to talk about it.

    I was born in '91 in a conservative family, and I grew up with the naive vision that international conflicts were a thing of the past and we could put politics aside and work on developing science and technology for the good of all humankind. Then, when I was 10 years old, I watched as every adult in the country lost their fucking minds over a couple buildings falling down. I watched our civil liberties get stripped away while we started stupid pointless wars that accomplished nothing and left far more people dead, with complete bipartisan support. In high school, I leaned Libertarian because Ron Paul was a thing and basically the only antiwar voice in politics, though I grew out of that once I no longer had teachers and parents bossing me around lol.

    I had hope for Obama, though I was still young and not politically engaged. He was going to shut down Guantanamo and hold the Bush administration accountable for their blatant war crimes and disregard for both international law and the constitution - or so I hoped. But he didn’t. He kept the illegal mass surveillance going and, contrary to his promise to protect whistleblowers, hunted Snowden to the ends of the earth for revealing the government’s crimes.

    As for my personal life at this time, I had no idea what I wanted to do, so I studied physics, thinking of it as a sort of “study of everything.” But even that wasn’t broad enough for me, I wanted to expand my cultural horizons as well, so I studied abroad in Japan for a year, which opened my mind to a more global perspective and reaffirmed my ideal of being a global citizen.

    At this point, I was a liberal, skeptical of both parties, and politically disengaged. Watched The Daily Show and would probably fit in just fine with .world. But then 2016 happened.

    I honestly didn’t jump on the Bernie train at first, because I subscribed to the “conventional wisdom” of moving to the center to win over moderate republicans. As the republicans went more and more extreme, the democrats would achieve total political dominance as the “party of reason,” Trump would lose in a landslide. Then he won. I was extremely furious and disappointed, I couldn’t believe it! How could this happen?

    In my personal life, I had entered the workforce. In spite of graduating with a B.S. in physics, my focus had been on studying things that were interesting to me, without regard to practical matters like my career. I’m probably somewhat autistic, I’ve always done very well on tests and grasped concepts quickly, but I got poor grades on account of neglecting homework. It wasn’t until upper division physics classes that I found myself actually having to study. I was also privileged enough to not be concerned about practical matters growing up. After graduating, I’ve worked menial jobs, including warehouse work at Amazon, which gave me plenty of time to think. Since I started having a boss and a landlord, my politics improved. I also had a traumatic experience with my brother who came back from the Middle East, “self medicated” with meth, and almost became a mass shooter, but that’s a story for another day.

    In order to figure things out, I tried to find a place to debate politics online, and wound up in the cesspool of r/CapitalismVSocialism, which was created by An-Caps. Freshly radical, I was of course more attracted to libertarian socialism, rejecting authoritarianism, though the term “tankie” was not popularized at the time. I saw right-libertarians as the more “reasonable” people on the right, an idea which I eventually became disavowed of by actually talking to them. Eventually, I realized that their whole ideology is based on wordplay, and that they, along with the right in general, have absolutely nothing of value to offer whatsoever, and their nonsense simply dragged down the level of debate, preventing anything of actual substance from being discussed.

    Leaving that behind, I looked for a left-wing space, and found many of them to be clownish. I was turned off of r/socialism from the “Catgirl fiasco,” and I was too skeptical of the democrats to fit into purely liberal spaces - both of which lacked the bluntness and diversity of thought I was looking for. As a last resort, I checked r/ChapoTrapHouse, which I had heard all sorts of nasty rumors about - but instead, it was exactly what I was looking for: a non-sectarian leftist space that didn’t have a stick up its ass and wasn’t afraid to tell off both right-wingers and crybullies, which made it reviled because the crybullies would run off and whine and make up rumors (just like .worlders do).

    During this time, I also did a good bit of reading. Progress and Poverty by Henry George helped me get a basic grasp of political economy, while All the Shah’s Men by Stephen Kinzer taught me about Iran’s historical attempts to reclaim their resources through a popular, liberal democratic movement, which was crushed by the CIA (similar stories can be found in many countries around the world).

    When the subreddit was banned I migrated to Hexbear (yes, I’m from there). I was still very skeptical of states like China and the USSR, but my opinion of America had plummetted in 2016, and I saw them as acting as a counterbalance to US hegemony. I took a perspective of being system-agnostic, that non-aligned nations ought to have as much flexibility as possible in regards to their economic situation so that they can experiment and get it right, and then that system can spread out of that. When there’s just a single hegemon, it can exert too much control, but in a multipolar world there are more options. I was reading Blackshirts and Reds by Michael Parenti and watching his lectures, as well as some snippets of theory.

    But probably the thing that really pushed me beyond that was Covid-19. In the US, they lied to us, telling us masks don’t work, and then sent us all back to work with no protections. Up until that point, I at least had trust in US scientific institutions, but that lie completely broke my trust, and it really sank in as real that the government does not give a single shit about protecting the people, and that my interests are completely in conflict with those of the state. Meanwhile, China actually listened to the science, they never told people not to wear masks, they did lockdowns, I even saw in Vietnam where the government delivered groceries right to people’s homes so they’d stay inside, while in the US everyone was scrambling over each other to buy toilet paper. I had to quit my job because the situation was so bad, I lived in the south and we had no protections at all.

    And yet, as usual, nobody was held accountable for the failure, and the government’s mistakes were swept under the rug while the media blamed China and spread rumors that it was some sort of bioweapon. Naturally, anti-Asian hate crimes skyrocketed because of that bullshit. You can actually see very clearly where most people were fairly ambivalent to China before 2019, and then there was a major shift, coinciding with a propaganda campaign. The goal, of course, is to sow fears of China in order to justify more funding to the military, and to distract from the government’s own failures. It’s no coincidence that China suddenly became a military threat the moment the war in Afghanistan started to wind down, always gotta have an enemy to justify why we’re building bombs instead of healthcare. And if some random people get hate crimed, the government doesn’t give a shit.

    Ultimately, I’d love to return to my initial dream of setting aside politics and pursuing science to build a better world for all. But how can I do that when you have cases like Jane Y. Wu, a distinguished neuroscientist who committed suicide after the US government shut down her lab for the sin of being born Chinese? How can I pretend that I’m a global citizen when the government shuts down innocent intercultural programs like the Confucious Institutes? I never signed up for this shit. I’m in this for humanity, not the United States, and the United States government is making it increasingly clear that it’s an enemy to the common cause of humanity.

    So there’s my life story. None of us are “Russian bots,” we’re mostly just downwardly-mobile disillusioned intellectuals.




  • It’s “guerrilla war,” not gorilla. Getting armed is good. But if you disagree with my tactical assessment, I’d at least recommend reading up on the movements that actually employed those tactics successfully. For example, here’s a very basic summation of the Vietnamese strategy:

    We are not at all close to phase 2, we could hardly even be said to have started phase 1. There is no organized system of cells, no infiltration of organizations, no stockpiles of weapons (unless it’s very well hidden, I suppose). Developing all those things is valid, but require time and effort. And generally an insurgency should also have a more presentable public facing front.

    In short, it’s complicated and if you’re serious about it you should study and think critically about how to apply it.


  • Exactly. The reason that democrats think republicans “fall in line” is because they see all these shitty politicians on the right, but they don’t realize that they’re looking at completely different things from republicans. You can be a total fucking dirtbag, hypocrite, completely incompetent, but as long as you bend the knee to the causes they care about, they don’t give a shit. Their standards are all about ideological purity, not character or competence. By contrast, democrats get outraged about any attempt at “purity testing,” and would rather have someone “competent,” which generally means, “willing to compromise to get things done.” Meanwhile republican politicians are always worried that if they work with democrats at all, they’ll be outflanked from the right. As a result, the country moves further and further to the right.

    That’s where crazy extremists like me think we should actually pay attention when the other side’s tactics work and learn from them. But I probably shouldn’t admit that or I’ll be hit with “horseshoe theory” 🙄




  • A war that becomes too costly to fight is a war lost.

    Depends on what you’re giving up if you lose. If you’re giving up a random colony in tiny nation across the world from you, you can throw in the towel pretty easily. If the cost of losing is that you are unseated from power entirely and left at the mercy of your enemies, then any cost is acceptable.

    i am not going to accept “its too hard” as a legitimate argument for giving up to tyranny.

    Valid, and not really what I’m trying to say. Just that the form of resistance we’re likely to see in the US is probably going to look different. Rather than Vietnam or the WoT, it may look more like The Troubles in Ireland, or something else entirely.

    In the event of a complete collapse of the US government, it’s unfortunately more likely that the right would take power, being much better armed. The right may be able to seize power and force a confrontation anyway.

    As long as we lack the strength to win a full civil war, it would be very foolish to provoke one. Which tactics are best used when is debatable, but we should keep a variety of tools in the toolbox and adapt to conditions rather than assuming a certain tactic is always best.