I would need to peer review that proof

You can compost them to grow organic food

You have to keep imagining the boobs or they disappear, so the unit is correct

That plus the oucher so you can make your robot scream as it cleans

For me it’s the parkour with the diagonal down attack plus environment dealing double damage too for some reason. Thank god after a while you can change the down attack.

There are many: the dudes from Bunny Drop and Honey and Clover, which are the adoptive fathers of their love interest; the chiropractor from Ranma and the teacher from DDDD. Just some infamous ones.

Not christian, but in abrahamic religions all human are children of God, so they should all be loved.

I think Dostoyevsky sums up pretty well, love everyone in theory, misanthropy in practice.

What about three boys?

I have two computers running Arch and two raspberries running Endeavour

Where is the money coming from? It would be just redistributing money to give it to some lucky people. Instead we could fight against inequality and skip a year of misery.

Three paragraphs may be too long of a read for that person

Surely you know better after skimming through a dictionary than me, an anarchist that has read dozens of anarchist theory books

Core ideas of anarchism: mutual aid, no hierarchies, stateless moneyless society, free association.

This person: anarchism is capitalism without rules

Lol, it shows you don’t know how things really work. New bullshit cites old bullshit, it’s all a game of pretending. You can check the statistics of fraudulent papers and that is just takes into account the most obvious ones.

That’s exactly the point. If you want to be a researcher right now you have to play their game. You have to publish papers even if you don’t have anything. So people publish bullshit, use chatGPT, force their name on papers they haven’t contributed and so on.

Meanwhile the science journals get paid by everyone and pay no one.

Same as OSs, but with Linux you choose when to update. Why would be browsers different?

It certainly doesn’t work, that’s why there exists stuff like arXiv and SciHub

They can the same way way the EU has fined Facebook and Google multiple times. The question is what can happen in this case if the fine is not played as the EU can not seize assets outside its territory.

Country laws can apply to services operating in the country, doesn’t matter where the company is based. Webs can deny to serve users in that country as many do.

Maybe it’s like diamonds. Even if it’s exactly the same it has no value unless it’s extracted from conflicted zones.