Technically no. Congress passed the AUMF which let the President go after anyone they deemed complicit in 9/11. It did not declare war against specific nations iirc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mnemonic?wprov=sfla1

Why would they need a “sign of innocence”?

Shut the fuck up

I didn’t describe any passages. Arguing with someone who doesn’t believe in tangible reality is a waste of time. Thank you for the conversation.

Then it should be condemned and called out for the hate and bigotry that it represents. Lol. Not a hard concept.

Except that piece of art isn’t guiding millions of people’s beliefs. What a dumb statement.

I think it’s very clear who is the psychotic one here. Thank you for the conversation, Prime Minister Chamberlain.

Yes. Not educating is the way to go. That always works out well!

I’m a capybara, king of the rats, thank you very much. The question is why won’t you condemn the aggressor and stop putting the onus of peace on the people who are being murdered by an aggressor?

And my question is why are you putting everything on the people who were invaded and not the aggressor? Are the Russian people not also being senselessly killed in a war started by their government?

Why wouldn’t you argue for the aggressor to leave? Seems kind of backwards to tell the country that was invaded to roll over and just give up to its fascist neighbor.

Maybe you should skip these threads in the future. Don’t you think it’s important for people to understand this concept? Not everyone knows everything. Educate.

That’s not what they said.

Not too smart, are ya?