Can we sell ourselves to Denmark and join Greenland?

I might just buy one of their games now to support their decision.

I just don’t know how much I can trust them to keep their word and not just brick the game in the future until an account is made.

Because new items can still use old technologies if it makes more sense to do so?

A 2025 vehicle with a manual radio sold for $30,000 might still sell better than a 2020 vehicle with a touchscreen dash for $25,000

Another Canadian with the same sentiment.

I feel like the sane world needs to make a global Alliance where if America tarriffs any country in the membership, everyone else responds with similar tarriffs.

America needs to learn that it isn’t alone in the world and it can’t survive in its current state without friends.

Poor Columbia having to give in to America’s demands over coffee, if they had an alliance with other countries maybe they could have said fuck you Trump.

Damn, now I’ve got to buy a $200 freezer to save $10 on spaghetti sauce.

Do you know how many tomatos are required to make sauce? SO MANY

Really? As a Canadian I was quite surprised to see your eggs so expensive.

I recently bought a dozen eggs for like $7cad which used to be $6cad (free range, the caged stuff was usually like $3.5-$4ish)

But at $5.50 usd that’s $8.00 cad, and I thought $7 was expensive!

deleted by creator

Very hidden. It took me awhile to find them since I never had to press that button before if it even was there before.

Not sure why they didn’t just keep the Mewtwo pack on the landing page and then add the dialga one, and when you press the dialga one it gives the option between the dialga and the other, like the Mewtwo gave the charizard and Pikachu options afterwards.

Good, there is absolutely no reason anyone should trust any corporation. They will screw you over at the flip of a dime if it meant they got to keep that dime.

I think Canada may only let us states join if they agree they don’t get to vote in elections. Americans have proved they can’t be trusted with that power.

Does this mean the Pikachu/charizard/Mewtwo packs are no longer available?

America will take Greenland, and then Canada is next being surrounded on three sides.

Can a NATO country invoke the defence pact if it’s attacked by another NATO country?

NATO vs America wasn’t on my bingo card.

I just want to swipe left and right to go back and forth between emails in my inbox ):

I’m getting sick of all this two step verification and code confirmation bullshit. I don’t need my Instagram password stored in a bank vault with 24 hour security. Let me opt out of all this extra security and if it gets breached then blame me for opting out.

I don’t even have two step verification turned on for something and I still needed to check my email for a code and then when logging into the email I needed to check my phone for a second code just so I could access the first code for some bullshit account I hardly ever use. It’s incredibly frustrating.

If I want to go through all that shit for security purposes then I will ask you to go through all those steps. Don’t force me to. Fuck.

I would assume empire to mean significant global power I guess. It often takes a century or two to even get to that status so 250 years average would be pretty short if it included the lead up and the decline. I wouldn’t consider Britain to be a significant empire like in their golden age.

China and America today I would say qualify, USSR maybe qualified for like a few decades at some point in the 1900s.

Just personal opinion though, no official hard qualifiers that I know of.

Seems like a pretty obvious outcome with the way it’s worded.

Those are pretty much the only options to end the war other than fighting which most would only choose out of revenge or spite.

The real important numbers would be how many would want to end the war through negotiation if it meant the current front lines became the new political borders, and if not how many would prefer to continue to fight to gain that territory back.

The only article that I could find where the source wasn’t explicitly “the whitehouse says” was BBC where they just said the Columbia hasn’t affirmed that they changed the terms after the tariff threat but also didn’t deny that they did.

China threatened 75% tarriffs when Trump mentioned 10% tarriffs. Don’t see him following through with his threat yet.

We need to make a global Alliance where if Trump tarriffs one country, every country responds with double the tarriffs.

Honestly I don’t think NDP has a chance of anything with Singh leading. There’s just no enthusiasm, he’s had his chance a few times now and nothing has improved. He should think of retiring from leadership as well if this election doesn’t turn out well.