I almost entirely agree with you. This should never have gotten to the point it did. If after the first time they said to provide an alternate payment I would say they wouldn’t even necessarily need to give any credit. The manager 100% should have taken over the call after at most an hour. My only issue with this was them knowing this was a problem and then saying to just try again. That’s when fault moved over to the airline. If the person didn’t have the money to pay for a 3rd flight that’s not their fault and the airline should handle that somehow.
- 3 Posts
- 93 Comments
Again, if it failed once I would agree. It didn’t though, they told them to try again which then moves at least partial blame back to them. They also have credit which isn’t a direct loss of that amount of money. I’m not saying they needed to to everything they did but if I were in that position I would expect the company that told me to run the payment again to be held responsible for it not working again, at least partially. This could even just have been saying, we’ll book the tickets and when you get the money back charge you again.
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Inside the Trans-Welcoming World of CosplayEnglish
4·22 days agoI read the title as “inside the trans-welcoming world of Coldplay” and was really confused for half a second.
That doesn’t change the fact this is clearly a known issue from AA and they continue to let that payment method get used. It’s their fault and on them to resolve because of that. Especially after they said to just try again.
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.zip•This rugged phone lets you hot-swap batteries without turning it offEnglish
24·25 days agoI used to never charge my phone and only charge the batteries. Then just swap them out when they got low. 1 battery charging, 1 in pocket charged, 1 in use in phone. It was very convenient to never have to think about the battery life. Less useful now but I could see some people still wanting that flexibility.
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
politics @lemmy.world•Epstein files bill allowing Bondi to "redact" details comes under scrutinyEnglish
10·2 months agoOnly the Democrats are under investigation so that should still show all the Republicans, right? (Though any Democrats on the list shouldn’t be protected either)
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Politics@sh.itjust.works•Trump Trashes 'Big, Fat, Rich Insurance Companies.' Progressives: 'Wait Until We Tell You About Medicare for All'English
12·2 months agoTrump is completely right, he should do his favorite thing and one up Obama and give everyone Medicare. That would not only show that he’s a better president than Obama ever was it would really piss off those insurance companies that he hates so much.
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Games@lemmy.world•Can anyone suggest me offline games for making kids practice control over the mouse ??😃😃😃English
11·2 months agoToday I Learned
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•[discussion] cars are so fucking stupidEnglish
121·2 months agoA tree root grows into your pipes, nothing you could’ve done to avoid it but now you have to pay to redo all the pipes in your house.
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Fuck AI@lemmy.world•We put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsEnglish
161·3 months agoNo it’s 1+(2+3)=1+5=15
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
3DPrinting@lemmy.world•Is it possible to 3D scan a motorcycle helmet and make smaller replicas?English
3·3 months agoEveryone else is correct that you can scan the helmet and 3d print it but it won’t include the signatures which you seen to want as well.
Where did you get it? I don’t want to get a knock off that doesn’t look as good
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•My Bank Recently Changed Their Interface to Move Money Between AccountsEnglish
2·4 months agoAlternatively, you go to a store and decide you want to buy something. Now that you know what you want to buy are you doing to use cash, card, or barter?
Randomocity@sh.itjust.worksto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Why is phone number verification requeriment for online services sometimes considered a privacy/security risk?English
7·4 months agoJust to clarify a few things from other comments. SMS MFA is still leagues above not having MFA for security. It’s not great but it will protect you in like 80% of cases where you would’ve been hacked if you didn’t have MFA at all. The primary problem with services that require any additional data from you though is that is an additional source for a leak. The same thing goes for name, address, phone number, etc. Phone numbers can be added to scam call lists which open you up to additional breach opportunities in the future, SIM swapping attacks, or even just using it as a number to spoof for other attacks. For most accounts that I don’t care about I would be reluctant to give my number as for those sites I value privacy over security, but that’s a separate discussion.
Organic bananas is just 94011
Normally these types of articles use more clinical verbiage
I googled “human thinks he’s dead” and that Wikipedia page was the first result
There are also State taxes that aren’t normally differentiated from when complaining about tax rates even though they go to different places. In some states it’s pretty much the same things.








https://youtu.be/MGSdYFR50Y8 I’m a fan of this cover