Writing that down as false alias info in my anti-doxxing note. Like hell would I ever list out my credentials on an anonymous forum.

I believe that’s just before the part that’s not just about plagiarism

deleted by creator

This is a thing in the US as well. Various benefits being tied to work that you have to apply for to retain the benefits and can’t deny offers for without risking losing those services.

Why did I just read the whole Wikipedia section on the origins of Pavlova in Australia and New Zealand?

Gonna make a video game called White Genocide and it’s just a dating sim where there are no pairings between a white man and a white woman

They also have pavlova though

There’s 2 things I hate

In true Australian fashion, they’re more open about it

The Hamilton Method

GOOD post (not funny though)

They will create disasters

Not a mod but I am 100% celebrating how the unions fucked your wife

Also, it still counts as pushing straight to prod if your PR reviewer gives it a once-over and stamps it with “LGTM”

To have such a strong, undiffused, and distant light that it could realistically mimic the shadows on the moon, you would need very modern CGI to replace the shadows of every actor on every frame. Supposedly the recording we have of the moon landing is of a camera pointed at a tv screen because simultaneously broadcasting and recording at the same time was still newer tech that NASA didn’t have set up. And even then, you can see the quick falloff of the shadows and how they run parallel to each other. The sophistication to pull off a fake was just not there.

Psych! Those are just the conditions of kids in the US’s border camps

deleted by creator

It would seem that younger Americans are indeed less susceptible to propaganda

Yeah, I don’t think it’s a ridiculous ask at all. I don’t think that it should be that hard of a thing to pull off and handle and I agree with what Awoo said below

I really need to remember the source because this seems to come up a lot. But Marx differentiated between proletarian workers whose labor power was used in production and other workers whose labor power was used in the redistribution of capital. For example, many finance capital workers are not proletarian. The terminology there may not be exactly right, but that’s the gist.

I think the whataboutisms that make class look murky are extremely rare. You’d need someone who both labors in production and owns the company and makes equal amounts from their wages and from their ownership. The capitalist class has long had a word for this type of person: a failure. I’d be happy to just call them petit bourgeois.